HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 90/5/3429    most recent 00456.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, J. Articles by Bickford, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, J. Articles by Bickford, M. E.

Two Distinct Types of Corticothalamic EPSPs and Their Contribution to Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity

¹Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292; and ²Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Submitted 12 May 2003; accepted in final form 23 July 2003

The lateral posterior nucleus (LPN) is innervated by two different morphological types of cortical terminals that originate from cortical layers V and VI. Here we describe two distinct types of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) that were recorded in the LPN after stimulation of corticothalamic fibers. These types of EPSPs differed in amplitude, latency, rise time, and response to increasing levels of stimulus intensity. The most frequently encountered EPSP, type I, displayed a longer latency and slower rise time than the less frequently encountered type II EPSP. Type I EPSPs also showed a graded increase in amplitude with increasing levels of stimulation, whereas type II EPSPs showed an all-or-none response. In response to repetitive stimulation (0.5-20 Hz), type I EPSPs displayed frequency-dependent facilitation, whereas type II EPSPs displayed frequency-dependent depression. Further details of these distinct forms of short-term synaptic plasticity were explored using paired-pulse stimuli. Pharmacology experiments revealed that both N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA glutamate receptors are involved in corticothalamic synaptic transmission in the LPN and contribute to both synaptic facilitation and depression. Taken together with the results of our previous anatomical studies, these results suggest that type I EPSPs arise from stimulation of layer VI afferents, whereas type II EPSPs arise from stimulation of layer V inputs. Moreover, type I and II EPSPs in the LPN may be functionally similar to corticogeniculate and retinogeniculate EPSPs, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Lee and S. M. Sherman Synaptic Properties of Thalamic and Intracortical Inputs to Layer 4 of the First- and Higher-Order Cortical Areas in the Auditory and Somatosensory Systems J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Landisman and B. W. Connors VPM and PoM Nuclei of the Rat Somatosensory Thalamus: Intrinsic Neuronal Properties and Corticothalamic Feedback Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2853 - 2865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Sirota, H. A. Swadlow, and I. N. Beloozerova Three Channels of Corticothalamic Communication during Locomotion J. Neurosci., June 22, 2005; 25(25): 5915 - 5925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Reichova and S. M. Sherman Somatosensory Corticothalamic Projections: Distinguishing Drivers From Modulators J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2185 - 2197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]