JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 24, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90659.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1526    most recent
90659.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tachibana, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mushiake, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tachibana, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mushiake, H.
Submitted on June 11, 2008
Revised on June 12, 2009
Accepted on June 14, 2009

Neural activity in the human brain signals logical rule identification

Kaori Tachibana1, Kyoko Suzuki2, Etsuro Mori3, Naoki Miura4, Ryuta Kawashima5, Kaoru Horie6, Shigeru Sato6, Jun Tanji7, and Hajime Mushiake3*

1 Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences
2 Yamagata University School of Medicine
3 Tohoku University School of Medicine
4 Kochi University of Technology
5 Tohoku Univ
6 Tohoku University Graduate School of International Cultural Studies
7 Tamagawa Univ.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hmushiak{at}mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp.

To select an appropriate action, we conform to a behavioral rule determined uniquely in each behavioral context. If the rule is not predetermined and must be discovered, we often test hypotheses concerning rules by applying one candidate rule after another. The neural mechanisms underlying such rule identification are still unknown. To explore which brain areas are involved in the process of logical rule identification, and to determine whether such areas differ from those taking part in implementing the rule to find a suitable action, we measured brain activation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while subjects performed a rule-identification task. The subjects were required to select a red or blue square on a screen based on either a "sequence rule" or a "probability rule". Positive or negative feedback to the subject's choice led the subject to identify the correct rule. We found that the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), caudate nucleus, fusiform gyrus, and middle temporal cortex exhibited significant activation during the period when subjects underwent the hypothesis testing. Among these brain areas, the pMFC and caudate nucleus were also activated in response to the critical feedback signals selectively during the trials when the subjects identified a rule. Furthermore, we found a significant enhancement in effective connectivity between the active regions in the pMFC and caudate regions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.