HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 91/1/274    most recent 00763.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crowder, N. A. Articles by Wylie, D. R.W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crowder, N. A. Articles by Wylie, D. R.W.

Telencephalic Input to the Pretectum of Pigeons: An Electrophysiological and Pharmacological Inactivation Study

¹ Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada; ² Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada

Submitted 6 August 2003; accepted in final form 20 September 2003

The pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) and the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the avian accessory optic system (AOS) are retinal-recipient visual nuclei involved in the analysis of optic flow that results from self-motion, and in the generation of the optokinetic response. Neurons in these nuclei show direction selectivity in response to large-field motion and are tuned in the spatiotemporal domain. In addition to retinal afferentation, both the nBOR and LM receive afferents from the Wulst, which is thought to be the avian homolog of the primary visual cortex. We examined the effects of Wulst electrical stimulation on the activity of LM neurons and recorded the directional and spatiotemporal tuning of LM neurons in pigeons before, during, and after the Wulst was temporarily inactivated by lidocaine injection. In response to Wulst electrical stimulation, LM neurons showed either short-latency excitation followed by longer-latency inhibition (W+ cells), or only a longer-latency inhibition (W– cells). The average response latencies for W+ and W– cells were 13.5 and 28.3 ms, respectively. The effects of Wulst stimulation did not correlate with either the directional or spatiotemporal tuning of the LM neurons. Injection of lidocaine into the nBOR reduced the longer-latency oscillations of W+ and W– cells. When the Wulst was temporarily inactivated by lidocaine neither the directional nor spatiotemporal response properties of LM neurons were affected. The possible functions of the projection from the Wulst to the LM are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y.-Q. Niu, Q. Xiao, R.-F. Liu, L.-Q. Wu, and S.-R. Wang Response characteristics of the pigeon's pretectal neurons to illusory contours and motion J. Physiol., December 15, 2006; 577(3): 805 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Maurice, H. Gioanni, and A. Abourachid Influence of the behavioural context on the optocollic reflex (OCR) in pigeons (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 292 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. R. Winship, N. A. Crowder, and D. R.W. Wylie Quantitative Reassessment of Speed Tuning in the Accessory Optic System and Pretectum of Pigeons J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 546 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]