HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 91/1/92    most recent 00495.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reynolds, R. F. Articles by Bronstein, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reynolds, R. F. Articles by Bronstein, A. M.

The Moving Platform Aftereffect: Limited Generalization of a Locomotor Adaptation

¹ Sobell Department of Motor Neurophysiology and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG; ² Academic Department of Neuro-otology, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom

Submitted 23 May 2003; accepted in final form 25 August 2003

We have recently described a postural after-effect of walking onto a stationary platform previously experienced as moving, which occurs despite full knowledge that the platform will no longer move. This experiment involves an initial baseline period when the platform is kept stationary (BEFORE condition), followed by a brief adaptation period when subjects learn to walk onto the platform moving at 1.2 m/s (MOVING condition). Subjects are clearly warned that the platform will no longer move and asked to walk onto it again (AFTER condition). Despite the warning, they walk toward the platform with a velocity greater than that observed during the BEFORE condition, and a large forward sway of the trunk is observed once they have landed on the platform. This aftereffect, which disappears within three trials, represents dissociation of knowledge and action. In the current set of experiments, to gain further insight into this phenomenon, we have manipulated three variables, the context, location, and method of the walking task, between the MOVING and AFTER conditions, to determine how far the adaptation will generalize. It was found that when the gait initiation cue was changed from beeps to a flashing light, or vice versa, there was no difference in the magnitude of the aftereffect, either in terms of walking velocity or forward sway of the trunk. Changing the leg with which gait was initiated, however, reduced sway magnitude by approximately 50%. When subjects changed from forward walking to backward walking, the aftereffect was abolished. Similarly, walking in a location other than the mobile platform did not produce any aftereffect. However, in these latter two experiments, the aftereffect reappeared when subjects reverted to the walking pattern used during the MOVING condition. Hence, these results show that a change in abstract context had no influence, whereas any deviation from the way and location in which the moving platform task was originally performed profoundly reduced the size of the aftereffect. Although the moving platform aftereffect is an example of inappropriate generalization by the motor system across time, these results show that this generalization is highly limited to the method and location in which the original adaptation took place.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. McVea and K. G. Pearson Long-Lasting, Context-Dependent Modification of Stepping in the Cat After Repeated Stumbling-Corrective Responses J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 659 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Lam and V. Dietz Transfer of Motor Performance in an Obstacle Avoidance Task to Different Walking Conditions J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2010 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]