JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 91: 719-727, 2004. First published October 22, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00859.2003
0022-3077/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/2/719    most recent
00859.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aksenov, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bracha, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aksenov, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bracha, V.

GABA Neurotransmission in the Cerebellar Interposed Nuclei: Involvement in Classically Conditioned Eyeblinks and Neuronal Activity

D. Aksenov, N. Serdyukova, K. Irwin and V. Bracha

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011

Submitted 3 September 2003; accepted in final form 15 October 2003

The cerebellar interposed nuclei (IN) are an essential part of circuits that control classically conditioned eyeblinks in the rabbit. The function of the IN is under the control of GABAergic projections from Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex. The exact involvement of cerebellar cortical input into the IN during eyeblink expression is not clear. While it is known that the application of {gamma}-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) agonists and antagonists affects the performance of classically conditioned eyeblinks, the effects of these drugs on IN neurons in vivo are not known. The purpose of the present study was to measure the effects of muscimol and picrotoxin on the expression of conditioned eyeblinks and the activity of IN cells simultaneously. Injections of muscimol abolished conditioned responses and either silenced or diminished the activity of IN cells. Two injections were administered in each picrotoxin experiment. The first injection of picrotoxin slightly modified the timing and amplitude of the eyeblink, produced mild tonic eyelid closure, increased tonic activity of IN cells, and reduced the amplitude of the neural responses. The second injection of picrotoxin abolished conditioned responses, further increased tonic eyelid closure, dramatically elevated the tonic activity of IN cells, and in most cases, abolished neuronal responses. These results demonstrate that both GABAA-mediated inactivation and tonic up-regulation of IN cells can interrupt the expression of conditioned eyeblinks and that this behavioral effect is accompanied by the suppression of the neuronal activity correlates of the conditioned stimulus and response.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. Bracha, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 2032 Vet. Med., Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 (E-mail: vbracha{at}iastate.edu).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Zbarska, J. R. Bloedel, and V. Bracha
Cerebellar Dysfunction Explains the Extinction-Like Abolition of Conditioned Eyeblinks After NBQX Injections in the Inferior Olive
J. Neurosci., January 2, 2008; 28(1): 10 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. F. Lepora, E. Mavritsaki, J. Porrill, C. H. Yeo, C. Evinger, and P. Dean
Evidence From Retractor Bulbi EMG for Linearized Motor Control of Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Responses
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2074 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Ohyama, W. L. Nores, J. F. Medina, F. A. Riusech, and M. D. Mauk
Learning-Induced Plasticity in Deep Cerebellar Nucleus
J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12656 - 12663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F.-P. Chen and C. Evinger
Cerebellar Modulation of Trigeminal Reflex Blinks: Interpositus Neurons
J. Neurosci., October 11, 2006; 26(41): 10569 - 10576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Gerwig, K. Hajjar, A. Dimitrova, M. Maschke, F. P. Kolb, M. Frings, A. F. Thilmann, M. Forsting, H. C. Diener, and D. Timmann
Timing of Conditioned Eyeblink Responses Is Impaired in Cerebellar Patients
J. Neurosci., April 13, 2005; 25(15): 3919 - 3931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. P. Aksenov, N. A. Serdyukova, J. R. Bloedel, and V. Bracha
Glutamate Neurotransmission in the Cerebellar Interposed Nuclei: Involvement in Classically Conditioned Eyeblinks and Neuronal Activity
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 44 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.