HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 91/3/1158    most recent 00704.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JN Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dingwell, J. B. Articles by Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dingwell, J. B. Articles by Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A.

Experimentally Confirmed Mathematical Model for Human Control of a Non-Rigid Object

¹Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712; ²Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60611; and ³Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Submitted 23 July 2003; accepted in final form 28 October 2003

Determining the principles used to plan and execute movements is a fundamental question in neuroscience research. When humans reach to a target with their hand, they exhibit stereotypical movements that closely follow an optimally smooth trajectory. Even when faced with various perceptual or mechanical perturbations, subjects readily adapt their motor output to preserve this stereotypical trajectory. When humans manipulate non-rigid objects, however, they must control the movements of the object as well as the hand. Such tasks impose a fundamentally different control problem than that of moving one's arm alone. Here, we developed a mathematical model for transporting a mass-on-a-spring to a target in an optimally smooth way. We demonstrate that the well-known "minimum-jerk" model for smooth reaching movements cannot accomplish this task. Our model extends the concept of smoothness to allow for the control of non-rigid objects. Although our model makes some predictions that are similar to minimum jerk, it predicts distinctly different optimal trajectories in several specific cases. In particular, when the relative speed of the movement becomes fast enough or when the object stiffness becomes small enough, the model predicts that subjects will transition from a uni-phasic hand motion to a bi-phasic hand motion. We directly tested these predictions in human subjects. Our subjects adopted trajectories that were well-predicted by our model, including all of the predicted transitions between uni- and bi-phasic hand motions. These findings suggest that smoothness of motion is a general principle of movement planning that extends beyond the control of hand trajectories.

Related articles in JN:

Flexible Control of Flexible Objects. Focus on "An Experimentally Confirmed Mathematical Model for Human Control of a Non-Rigid Object"

Kurt A. Thoroughman
JN 2004 91: 1109-1110. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Ben-Itzhak and A. Karniel Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural Comput., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 779 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Thoroughman, W. Wang, and D. N. Tomov Influence of Viscous Loads on Motor Planning J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 870 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Thoroughman Flexible Control of Flexible Objects. Focus on "An Experimentally Confirmed Mathematical Model for Human Control of a Non-Rigid Object" J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1109 - 1110. [Full Text] [PDF]