HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 91/3/1271    most recent 00588.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Read, J. C. A. Articles by Cumming, B. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Read, J. C. A. Articles by Cumming, B. G.

Ocular Dominance Predicts Neither Strength Nor Class of Disparity Selectivity With Random-Dot Stimuli in Primate V1

Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4435

Submitted 17 June 2003; accepted in final form 24 September 2003

We address two unresolved issues concerning the coding of binocular disparity in primary visual cortex. Experimental studies and theoretical models have suggested a relationship between a cell's ocular dominance, assessed with monocular stimuli, and its tuning to binocular disparity. First, the disparity energy model of disparity selectivity suggests that there should be a correlation between ocular dominance and the strength of disparity tuning. Second, several studies have reported a relationship between ocular dominance and the shape of the disparity tuning curve, with cells dominated by one eye more likely to have disparity tuning of the tuned-inhibitory type. We investigated both of these relationships in single neurons recorded from the primary visual cortex of awake fixating macaques, using dynamic random-dot patterns as a stimulus. To classify disparity tuning curves quantitatively, we develop a new measure of symmetry, which can be applied to any function. We find no evidence for any correlation between ocular dominance and the nature of disparity tuning. This places constraints on the circuitry underlying disparity tuning.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Tanabe and B. G. Cumming Mechanisms Underlying the Transformation of Disparity Signals from V1 to V2 in the Macaque J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11304 - 11314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kumano, S. Tanabe, and I. Fujita Spatial Frequency Integration for Binocular Correspondence in Macaque Area V4 J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 402 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Adams and J. C. Horton Monocular Cells Without Ocular Dominance Columns J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2253 - 2264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Nienborg and B. G. Cumming Macaque v2 neurons, but not v1 neurons, show choice-related activity. J. Neurosci., September 13, 2006; 26(37): 9567 - 9578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Tanabe, T. Doi, K. Umeda, and I. Fujita Disparity-Tuning Characteristics of Neuronal Responses to Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms in Macaque Visual Area V4 J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2683 - 2699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C Horton and D. L Adams The cortical column: a structure without a function Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2005; 360(1456): 837 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]