HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 91/3/1350    most recent 00184.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Knill, D. C. Articles by Kersten, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Knill, D. C. Articles by Kersten, D.

Visuomotor Sensitivity to Visual Information About Surface Orientation

¹Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627; and ²Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 55455

Submitted 26 February 2003; accepted in final form 15 October 2003

We measured human visuomotor sensitivity to visual information about three-dimensional surface orientation by analyzing movements made to place an object on a slanted surface. We applied linear discriminant analysis to the kinematics of subjects' movements to surfaces with differing slants (angle away form the fronto-parallel) to derive visuomotor d's for discriminating surfaces differing in slant by 5°. Subjects' visuomotor sensitivity to information about surface orientation was very high, with discrimination "thresholds" ranging from 2 to 3 degrees. In a first experiment, we found that subjects performed only slightly better using binocular cues alone than monocular texture cues and that they showed only weak evidence for combining the cues when both were available, suggesting that monocular cues can be just as effective in guiding motor behavior in depth as binocular cues. In a second experiment, we measured subjects' perceptual discrimination and visuomotor thresholds in equivalent stimulus conditions to decompose visuomotor sensitivity into perceptual and motor components. Subjects' visuomotor thresholds were found to be slightly greater than their perceptual thresholds for a range of memory delays, from 1 to 3 s. The data were consistent with a model in which perceptual noise increases with increasing delay between stimulus presentation and movement initiation, but motor noise remains constant. This result suggests that visuomotor and perceptual systems rely on the same visual estimates of surface slant for memory delays ranging from 1 to 3 s.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Melmoth, A. L. Finlay, M. J. Morgan, and S. Grant Grasping Deficits and Adaptations in Adults with Stereo Vision Losses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2009; 50(8): 3711 - 3720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Cardoso-Leite and A. Gorea Comparison of Perceptual and Motor Decisions Via Confidence Judgments and Saccade Curvature J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 2822 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]