| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Motor Control Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1428
Submitted 30 October 2003; accepted in final form 25 November 2003
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dual tasks to investigate the physiology of how movements become automatic. Normal subjects were asked to practice some self-initiated, self-paced, memorized sequential finger movements with different complexity until they could perform the tasks automatically. Automaticity was evaluated by having subjects perform a secondary task simultaneously with the sequential movements. Our secondary task was a letter-counting task where subjects were asked to identify the number of times a target letter from the letter sequences was seen. Only the performances that achieved high accuracy in both single and dual tasks were considered automatic. The fMRI results before and after automaticity was achieved were compared. Our data showed that for both conditions, sequential movements activated similar brain regions. No additional activity was observed in the automatic condition. There was less activity in bilateral cerebellum, presupplementary motor area, cingulate cortex, left caudate nucleus, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, and prefrontal cortex during the automatic stage. These findings suggest that most of the motor network participates in executing automatic movements and that it becomes more efficient as movements become more automatic. Our results do not provide evidence for any area to become more activated for automatic movements.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Mazzoni Efficient motor control: how can less be more? J. Physiol., September 1, 2008; 586(17): 4031 - 4031. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Wu, P. Chan, and M. Hallett Modifications of the interactions in the motor networks when a movement becomes automatic J. Physiol., September 1, 2008; 586(17): 4295 - 4304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Mukai, D. Kim, M. Fukunaga, S. Japee, S. Marrett, and L. G. Ungerleider Activations in Visual and Attention-Related Areas Predict and Correlate with the Degree of Perceptual Learning J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11401 - 11411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Jubault, C. Ody, and E. Koechlin Serial Organization of Human Behavior in the Inferior Parietal Cortex J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 11028 - 11036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Lehericy, E. Bardinet, L. Tremblay, P.-F. Van de Moortele, J.-B. Pochon, D. Dormont, D.-S. Kim, J. Yelnik, and K. Ugurbil Motor control in basal ganglia circuits using fMRI and brain atlas approaches Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 149 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Wu and M. Hallett A functional MRI study of automatic movements in patients with Parkinson's disease Brain, October 1, 2005; 128(10): 2250 - 2259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Lehericy, H. Benali, P.-F. Van de Moortele, M. Pelegrini-Issac, T. Waechter, K. Ugurbil, and J. Doyon Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning PNAS, August 30, 2005; 102(35): 12566 - 12571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Poldrack, F. W. Sabb, K. Foerde, S. M. Tom, R. F. Asarnow, S. Y. Bookheimer, and B. J. Knowlton The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity J. Neurosci., June 1, 2005; 25(22): 5356 - 5364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Wu and M. Hallett The influence of normal human ageing on automatic movements J. Physiol., January 15, 2005; 562(2): 605 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
