| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Sensory-MotorSystems, Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Submitted 6 November 2003; accepted in final form 17 December 2003
Reflexively orienting toward a peripheral cue can influence subsequent responses to a target, depending on when and where the cue and target appear relative to each other. At short delays between the cue and target [cue-target onset asynchrony (CTOA)], subjects are faster to respond when they appear at the same location, an effect referred to as reflexive attentional capture. At longer CTOAs, subjects are slower to respond when the two appear at the same location, an effect referred to as inhibition of return (IOR). Recent evidence suggests that these phenomena originate from sensory interactions between the cue- and target-related responses. The capture of attention originates from a strong target-related response, derived from the overlap of the cue- and target-related activities, whereas IOR corresponds to a weaker target-aligned response. If such interactions are responsible, then modifying their nature should impact the neuronal and behavioral outcome. Monkeys performed a cue-target saccade task featuring visual and auditory cues while neural activity was recorded from the superior colliculus (SC). Compared with visual stimuli, auditory responses are weaker and occur earlier, thereby decreasing the likelihood of interactions between these signals. Similar to previous studies, visual stimuli evoked reflexive attentional capture at a short CTOA (60 ms) and IOR at longer CTOAs (160 and 610 ms) with corresponding changes in the target-aligned activity in the SC. Auditory cues used in this study failed to elicit either a behavioral effect or modification of SC activity at any CTOA, supporting the hypothesis that reflexive orienting is mediated by sensory interactions between the cue and target stimuli.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. H. Fecteau and D. P. Munoz Warning Signals Influence Motor Processing J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1600 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Lehky and A. B. Sereno Comparison of Shape Encoding in Primate Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 307 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Fecteau and D. P. Munoz Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2005; 17(11): 1714 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. H. Bell, M. A. Meredith, A. J. Van Opstal, and D. P. Munoz Crossmodal Integration in the Primate Superior Colliculus Underlying the Preparation and Initiation of Saccadic Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3659 - 3673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cavanaugh and R. H. Wurtz Subcortical Modulation of Attention Counters Change Blindness J. Neurosci., December 15, 2004; 24(50): 11236 - 11243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. McPeek Strange Things, Moving Things, Wild Animals. Focus on "Neural Correlates of the Automatic and Goal-Driven Biases in Orienting Spatial Attention" J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1267 - 1268. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Fecteau, A. H. Bell, and D. P. Munoz Neural Correlates of the Automatic and Goal-Driven Biases in Orienting Spatial Attention J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1728 - 1737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
