JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 24, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91154.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1763    most recent
91154.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanel, H. D.I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanel, H. D.I.
Submitted on October 19, 2008
Revised on June 22, 2009
Accepted on June 23, 2009

Brainstem Feedback in a Computational Model of Birdsong Sequencing

Leif Gibb1*, Timothy Q Gentner2, and Henry D.I. Abarbanel3

1 University of California, San Diego
2 UC San Diego
3 UCSD

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lgibb{at}ucsd.edu.

Uncovering the roles of neural feedback in the brain is an active area of experimental research. In songbirds, the telencephalic premotor nucleus HVC receives neural feedback from both forebrain and brainstem areas. Here we present a computational model of birdsong sequencing that incorporates HVC and associated nuclei and builds on the model of sparse bursting presented in our preceding companion paper. Our model embodies the hypotheses that (1) different networks in HVC control different syllables or notes of birdsong, (2) interneurons in HVC not only participate in sparse bursting but also provide mutual inhibition between networks controlling syllables or notes, and (3) these syllable networks are sequentially excited by neural feedback via the brainstem and the afferent thalamic nucleus Uva, or a similar feedback pathway. We discuss the model's ability to unify physiological, behavioral, and lesion results, and we use it to make novel predictions that can be tested experimentally. The model suggests a neural basis for sequence variations, shows that stimulation in the feedback pathway may have different effects depending on the balance of excitation and inhibition at the input to HVC from Uva, and predicts deviations from uniform expansion of syllables and gaps during HVC cooling.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Gibb, T. Q. Gentner, and H. D. I. Abarbanel
Inhibition and Recurrent Excitation in a Computational Model of Sparse Bursting in Song Nucleus HVC
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1748 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.