JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 1, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.91367.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1513    most recent
91367.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, R. D
Right arrow Articles by Highstein, S. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, R. D
Right arrow Articles by Highstein, S. M.
Submitted on December 31, 2008
Revised on June 22, 2009
Accepted on June 28, 2009

Efferent Control of Hair Cell and Afferent Responses in the Semicircular Canals

Richard D Boyle1*, Richard D Rabbitt2, and Stephen M. Highstein3

1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration
2 University of Utah
3 Washington University School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: highstein{at}medicine.wustl.edu.

The sensations of sound and motion generated by the inner ear are controlled by the brain through extensive centripetal innervation originating within the brainstem. In the semicircular canals, brainstem efferent neurons make synaptic contacts with mechano-sensory hair cells and with the dendrites of afferent neurons. Here, we examine the relative contributions of efferent action on hair cells and afferents. Experiments were performed in-vivo in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau. The efferent system was activated via electrical pulses to the brainstem, and sensory responses to motion stimuli were quantified by simultaneous voltage recording from afferents and intracellular current and/or voltage-clamp recordings from hair cells. Results showed synaptic inputs to both afferents and hair cells leading to relatively long latency intracellular signaling responses: excitatory in afferents and inhibitory in hair cells. Generally, the net effect of efferent action was an increase in afferent background discharge and a simultaneous decrease in gain to angular motion stimuli. Inhibition of hair cells was likely the result of a ligand-gated opening of a major basolateral conductance. The reversal potential of the efferent-evoked current was just below the hair cell resting potential thus resulting in a small hyperpolarization. The onset latency averaged ~90ms and latency to peak response was 150-400ms. Hair cell inhibition often outlasted afferent excitation and in some cases latched hair cells in the "off" condition for over a second following cessation of stimulus. These features endow the animal with a powerful means to adjust the sensitivity and dynamic range of motion sensation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.