HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 92/1/622    most recent 00974.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pinsk, M. A. Articles by Kastner, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pinsk, M. A. Articles by Kastner, S.

REPORT

Push-Pull Mechanism of Selective Attention in Human Extrastriate Cortex

Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544

Submitted 9 October 2003; accepted in final form 11 February 2004

Selective attention operates in visual cortex by facilitating processing of selected stimuli and by filtering out unwanted information from nearby distracters over circumscribed regions of visual space. The neural representation of unattended stimuli outside this focus of attention is less well understood. We studied the neural fate of unattended stimuli using functional magnetic resonance imaging by dissociating the activity evoked by attended (target) stimuli presented to the periphery of a visual hemifield and unattended (distracter) stimuli presented simultaneously to a corresponding location of the contralateral hemifield. Subjects covertly directed attention to a series of target stimuli and performed either a low or a high attentional-load search task on a stream of otherwise identical stimuli. With this task, target-search-related activity increased with increasing attentional load, whereas distracter-related activity decreased with increasing load in areas V4 and TEO but not in early areas V1 and V2. This finding presents evidence for a load-dependent push-pull mechanism of selective attention that operates over large portions of the visual field at intermediate processing stages. This mechanism appeared to be controlled by a distributed frontoparietal network of brain areas that reflected processes related to target selection during spatially directed attention.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Gazzaley, W. Clapp, J. Kelley, K. McEvoy, R. T. Knight, and M. D'Esposito Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing PNAS, September 2, 2008; 105(35): 13122 - 13126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. N. Boehler, J. K. Tsotsos, M. A. Schoenfeld, H.-J. Heinze, and J.-M. Hopf The Center-Surround Profile of the Focus of Attention Arises from Recurrent Processing in Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, August 28, 2008; (2008) bhn139v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Sestieri, C. M. Sylvester, A. I. Jack, G. d'Avossa, G. L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta Independence of Anticipatory Signals for Spatial Attention From Number of Nontarget Stimuli in the Visual Field J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 829 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. SanMiguel, M.-J. Corral, and C. Escera When Loading Working Memory Reduces Distraction: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from an Auditory-Visual Distraction Paradigm J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1131 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Talmi, A. K. Anderson, L. Riggs, J. B. Caplan, and M. Moscovitch Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures Learn. Mem., March 5, 2008; 15(3): 172 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cicek, D. Gitelman, R. S. E. Hurley, A. Nobre, and M. Mesulam Anatomical Physiology of Spatial Extinction Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2892 - 2898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Shulman, S. V. Astafiev, M. P. McAvoy, G. d'Avossa, and M. Corbetta Right TPJ Deactivation during Visual Search: Functional Significance and Support for a Filter Hypothesis Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2625 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. McMains, H. M. Fehd, T.-A. Emmanouil, and S. Kastner Mechanisms of Feature- and Space-Based Attention: Response Modulation and Baseline Increases J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2110 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. W. Roach and J. H. Hogben Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 771 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. C. Ruff, A. Kristjansson, P. Rotshtein, and J. Driver On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2601 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Hopf, C. N. Boehler, S. J. Luck, J. K. Tsotsos, H.-J. Heinze, and M. A. Schoenfeld Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision PNAS, January 24, 2006; 103(4): 1053 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Schwartz, P. Vuilleumier, C. Hutton, A. Maravita, R. J. Dolan, and J. Driver Attentional Load and Sensory Competition in Human Vision: Modulation of fMRI Responses by Load at Fixation during Task-irrelevant Stimulation in the Peripheral Visual Field Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2005; 15(6): 770 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gazzaley, J. W. Cooney, K. McEvoy, R. T. Knight, and M. D'Esposito Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2005; 17(3): 507 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]