HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 92/3/1512    most recent 01174.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ilg, U. J. Articles by Churan, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ilg, U. J. Articles by Churan, J.

Motion Perception Without Explicit Activity in Areas MT and MST

¹Oculomotor Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen; and ²Generation Research Program, University of München, 83646 Bad Tölz, Germany

Submitted 8 December 2003; accepted in final form 10 April 2004

It is widely accepted that middle temporal (MT) and middle superior temporal (MST) cortical areas in the brain of rhesus monkeys are essential for processing visual motion. We asked whether this assumption holds true if the moving stimulus consists of a second-order motion stimulus. In addition, we asked whether neurons in area MT and MST code for moving sound sources. To answer these questions, we trained three rhesus monkeys on a direction-discrimination task. Our monkeys were able to correctly report the direction of all motion stimuli used in this study. Firing rates of directionally selective neurons from area MT (n = 38) and MST (n = 68) were recorded during task performance. These neurons coded only for the stimulus movement if the motion stimulus was separated from the background by luminance or flicker (Fourier and drift-balanced motion). If these segregation cues were absent (in the case of theta motion and of the moving sound source), firing rates did not code for the stimulus' direction. Therefore we conclude that although areas MT and MST are undoubtedly involved in processing a moving stimulus, they are not the final cortical stages responsible for perceiving it.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. I. Braun, N. Mennie, C. Rasche, A. C. Schutz, M. J. Hawken, and K. R. Gegenfurtner Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements to Isoluminant Targets J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1287 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hayashi, K. Miura, H. Tabata, and K. Kawano Eye Movements in Response to Dichoptic Motion: Evidence for a Parallel-Hierarchical Structure of Visual Motion Processing in Primates J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2329 - 2346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-J. Orban de Xivry and P. Lefevre Saccades and pursuit: two outcomes of a single sensorimotor process J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 11 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Spering and K. R. Gegenfurtner Contrast and Assimilation in Motion Perception and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. J. Ilg and S. Schumann Primate Area MST-l Is Involved in the Generation of Goal-Directed Eye and Hand Movements J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 761 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.S.C. Price, M. R. Ibbotson, S. Ono, and M. J. Mustari Rapid Processing of Retinal Slip During Saccades in Macaque Area MT J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 235 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]