JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 92: 1728-1737, 2004. First published April 28, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00184.2004
0022-3077/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1728    most recent
00184.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fecteau, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Munoz, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fecteau, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Munoz, D. P.

Neural Correlates of the Automatic and Goal-Driven Biases in Orienting Spatial Attention

Jillian H. Fecteau, Andrew H. Bell and Douglas P. Munoz

Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

Submitted 26 February 2004; accepted in final form 21 April 2004

How do stimuli in the environment interact with the goals of observers? We addressed this question by showing that the relevance of an abruptly appearing visual object (cue) changes how observers orient attention toward a subsequent object (target) and how this target is represented in the activity of neurons in the superior colliculus. Initially after the appearance of the cue, attention is driven to its locus. This capture of attention is followed by a second bias in orienting attention, where observers preferentially orient to new locations in the visual scene—an effect called inhibition of return. In the superior colliculus, these two automatic biases in orienting attention were associated with changes in neural activity linked to the appearance of the target—relatively stronger activity linked to the capture of attention and weaker activity linked to inhibition of return. This behavioral pattern changes when the cue predicts the upcoming location of the target—the benefit associated with the capture of attention is enhanced and inhibition of return is reduced. These goal-driven changes in behavior were associated with an increase in pretarget- and target-related activity. Taken together, the goals of observers modify stimulus-driven changes in neural activity with both signals represented in the salience maps of the superior colliculi.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. P. Munoz, Dept. of Physiology, Queen's University, 4th Floor, Botterell Hall, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada (E-mail: doug{at}eyeml.queensu.ca).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. P. Mayo and M. A. Sommer
Neuronal Adaptation Caused by Sequential Visual Stimulation in the Frontal Eye Field
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1923 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Rezvani and B. D. Corneil
Recruitment of a Head-Turning Synergy by Low-Frequency Activity in the Primate Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 397 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. C. Dorris, E. Olivier, and D. P. Munoz
Competitive Integration of Visual and Preparatory Signals in the Superior Colliculus during Saccadic Programming
J. Neurosci., May 9, 2007; 27(19): 5053 - 5062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. H. Fecteau and D. P. Munoz
Warning Signals Influence Motor Processing
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1600 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. T. Serences and S. Yantis
Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 284 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. J. Snyder and A. Chatterjee
The frontal cortex and exogenous attentional orienting.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2006; 18(11): 1913 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. H. Fecteau and D. P. Munoz
Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2005; 17(11): 1714 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. R. Muller, M. G. Philiastides, and W. T. Newsome
Inaugural Article: Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes
PNAS, January 18, 2005; 102(3): 524 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. McPeek
Strange Things, Moving Things, Wild Animals. Focus on "Neural Correlates of the Automatic and Goal-Driven Biases in Orienting Spatial Attention"
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1267 - 1268.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.