|
|
||||||||
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Submitted 26 February 2004; accepted in final form 21 April 2004
How do stimuli in the environment interact with the goals of observers? We addressed this question by showing that the relevance of an abruptly appearing visual object (cue) changes how observers orient attention toward a subsequent object (target) and how this target is represented in the activity of neurons in the superior colliculus. Initially after the appearance of the cue, attention is driven to its locus. This capture of attention is followed by a second bias in orienting attention, where observers preferentially orient to new locations in the visual scenean effect called inhibition of return. In the superior colliculus, these two automatic biases in orienting attention were associated with changes in neural activity linked to the appearance of the targetrelatively stronger activity linked to the capture of attention and weaker activity linked to inhibition of return. This behavioral pattern changes when the cue predicts the upcoming location of the targetthe benefit associated with the capture of attention is enhanced and inhibition of return is reduced. These goal-driven changes in behavior were associated with an increase in pretarget- and target-related activity. Taken together, the goals of observers modify stimulus-driven changes in neural activity with both signals represented in the salience maps of the superior colliculi.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Mayo and M. A. Sommer Neuronal Adaptation Caused by Sequential Visual Stimulation in the Frontal Eye Field J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1923 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rezvani and B. D. Corneil Recruitment of a Head-Turning Synergy by Low-Frequency Activity in the Primate Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 397 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Dorris, E. Olivier, and D. P. Munoz Competitive Integration of Visual and Preparatory Signals in the Superior Colliculus during Saccadic Programming J. Neurosci., May 9, 2007; 27(19): 5053 - 5062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Fecteau and D. P. Munoz Warning Signals Influence Motor Processing J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1600 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Serences and S. Yantis Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 284 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Snyder and A. Chatterjee The frontal cortex and exogenous attentional orienting. J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2006; 18(11): 1913 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Fecteau and D. P. Munoz Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2005; 17(11): 1714 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Muller, M. G. Philiastides, and W. T. Newsome Inaugural Article: Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes PNAS, January 18, 2005; 102(3): 524 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. McPeek Strange Things, Moving Things, Wild Animals. Focus on "Neural Correlates of the Automatic and Goal-Driven Biases in Orienting Spatial Attention" J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1267 - 1268. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |