JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 92: 1756-1769, 2004. First published May 12, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00995.2003
0022-3077/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1756    most recent
00995.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Funahashi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Funahashi, S.

Neuronal Activity Throughout the Primate Mediodorsal Nucleus of the Thalamus During Oculomotor Delayed-Responses. II. Activity Encoding Visual Versus Motor Signal

Yumiko Watanabe and Shintaro Funahashi

Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

Submitted 15 October 2003; accepted in final form 27 April 2004

We collected single-neuron activity from the mediodorsal (MD) nucleus of the thalamus, examined the information that was represented by task-related activity during performance of a spatial working memory task, and compared the present results with those obtained in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We used two oculomotor delayed-response (ODR) tasks. In the ordinary ODR task, monkeys were required to make a memory-guided saccade to the location where a visual cue had been presented 3 s previously, whereas in the rotatory ODR task, they were required to make a memory-guided saccade 90° clockwise from the cue direction. By comparing the best directions of the same task-related activity between the two tasks, we could determine whether this activity represented the cue location or the saccade direction. All cue-period activity represented the cue location. In contrast, 56% of delay-period activity represented the cue location and 41% represented the saccade direction. Almost all response-period activity represented the saccade direction. These results indicate that task-related MD activity represents either visual or motor information, suggesting that the MD participates in sensory-to-motor information processing. However, a greater proportion of delay- and response-period activities represented the saccade direction in the MD than in the DLPFC, indicating that more MD neurons participate in prospective information processing than DLPFC neurons. These results suggest that although functional interactions between the MD and DLPFC are crucial to cognitive functions such as working memory, there is a difference in how the MD and DLPFC participate in these functions.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Funahashi, Dept. of Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan (E-mail: h50400{at}sakura.kudpc.kyoto-u.ac.jp).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Tanibuchi, H. Kitano, and K. Jinnai
Substantia Nigra Output to Prefrontal Cortex Via Thalamus in Monkeys. II. Activity of Thalamic Relay Neurons in Delayed Conditional Go/No-Go Discrimination Task
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2946 - 2954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
Y. Watanabe, K. Takeda, and S. Funahashi
Population Vector Analysis of Primate Mediodorsal Thalamic Activity during Oculomotor Delayed-Response Performance
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 1313 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. G. Mair and J. R. Hembrook
Memory Enhancement with Event-Related Stimulation of the Rostral Intralaminar Thalamic Nuclei
J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14293 - 14300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Kurata
Activity Properties and Location of Neurons in the Motor Thalamus That Project to the Cortical Motor Areas in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 550 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Tanaka
Involvement of the Central Thalamus in the Control of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., June 22, 2005; 25(25): 5866 - 5876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Watanabe and S. Funahashi
Neuronal Activity Throughout the Primate Mediodorsal Nucleus of the Thalamus During Oculomotor Delayed-Responses. I. Cue-, Delay-, and Response-Period Activity
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1738 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.