| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge 02138; 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 3McGovern Institute for Brain Research, and 4Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts 02139; and 5Institute for Neuroinformatics, Universität Zürich/Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8057 Zurich Switzerland
Submitted 25 November 2003; accepted in final form 2 April 2004
Sparse neural codes have been widely observed in cortical sensory and motor areas. A striking example of sparse temporal coding is in the song-related premotor area high vocal center (HVC) of songbirds: The motor neurons innervating avian vocal muscles are driven by premotor nucleus robustus archistriatalis (RA), which is in turn driven by nucleus HVC. Recent experiments reveal that RA-projecting HVC neurons fire just one burst per song motif. However, the function of this remarkable temporal sparseness has remained unclear. Because birdsong is a clear example of a learned complex motor behavior, we explore in a neural network model with the help of numerical and analytical techniques the possible role of sparse premotor neural codes in song-related motor learning. In numerical simulations with nonlinear neurons, as HVC activity is made progressively less sparse, the minimum learning time increases significantly. Heuristically, this slowdown arises from increasing interference in the weight updates for different synapses. If activity in HVC is sparse, synaptic interference is reduced, and is minimized if each synapse from HVC to RA is used only once in the motif, which is the situation observed experimentally. Our numerical results are corroborated by a theoretical analysis of learning in linear networks, for which we derive a relationship between sparse activity, synaptic interference, and learning time. If songbirds acquire their songs under significant pressure to learn quickly, this study predicts that HVC activity, currently measured only in adults, should also be sparse during the sensorimotor phase in the juvenile bird. We discuss the relevance of these results, linking sparse codes and learning speed, to other multilayered sensory and motor systems.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. R. Fiete, M. S. Fee, and H. S. Seung Model of Birdsong Learning Based on Gradient Estimation by Dynamic Perturbation of Neural Conductances J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2038 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Glaze and T. W. Troyer Behavioral Measurements of a Temporally Precise Motor Code for Birdsong J. Neurosci., July 18, 2007; 27(29): 7631 - 7639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. G. Cooper and F. Goller Physiological Insights Into the Social-Context-Dependent Changes in the Rhythm of the Song Motor Program J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3798 - 3809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Sirota, H. A. Swadlow, and I. N. Beloozerova Three Channels of Corticothalamic Communication during Locomotion J. Neurosci., June 22, 2005; 25(25): 5915 - 5925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Leonardo and M. S. Fee Ensemble Coding of Vocal Control in Birdsong J. Neurosci., January 19, 2005; 25(3): 652 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
