HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 92/5/3014    most recent 00402.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Behrend, O. Articles by Carlile, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Behrend, O. Articles by Carlile, S.

Neural Responses to Free Field and Virtual Acoustic Stimulation in the Inferior Colliculus of the Guinea Pig

¹Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physiology, ²School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

Submitted 20 April 2004; accepted in final form 21 June 2004

Virtual auditory space (VAS) stimuli based on outer ear transfer functions became increasingly important in spatial hearing research. However, few studies have investigated the match between responses of auditory neurons to VAS and free-field (FF) stimulation. This study validates acoustic spatial receptive fields (SRFs) of 183 individual midbrain units using both VAS and FF stimuli. The first-spike latency, which varied systematically across SRFs, was 14.9 ± 8.3 (SD) ms in FF, and 15.1 ± 8.3 ms in VAS. Spike-count-based SRFs measured 0–20 dB above the neural threshold covered on average 44.5 ± 18.0% of the recorded sphere in FF and 45.5 ± 18.7% in VAS. The average deviation of the centroid position of SRFs using FF and VAS stimuli was 7.4° azimuth and 3.3° elevation. The average spike rate remained unchanged. The SRF overlap recorded using FF and VAS stimuli (mean: 71.3 ± 12.6%) or repeated FF stimuli (70.2 ± 14.2%) was high and strongly correlated (r = 0.96; P < 0.05). The SRF match observed with FF and VAS stimuli was not significantly altered over a range of stimulus levels (paired t-test P = 0.51; n = 6). Randomized VAS barely affected SRF sizes, centroids, or maximum spike count but decreased the average minimum response to 59% compared with sequential stimulation (paired t-test; P = 0.05; n = 26). SRF recordings in VAS excluding the acoustic distortions of the recording equipment differed from those in VAS incorporating the equipment (paired t-test P = 0.01; n = 5). In conclusion, neurophysiological recordings demonstrate that individualized VAS stimuli provided a good simulation of a FF environment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. K. Porter, R. R. Metzger, and J. M. Groh Representation of Eye Position in Primate Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1826 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. A. Campbell, T. P. Doubell, F. R. Nodal, J. W. H. Schnupp, and A. J. King Interaural Timing Cues Do Not Contribute to the Map of Space in the Ferret Superior Colliculus: A Virtual Acoustic Space Study J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 242 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]