HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 92/6/3298    most recent 00198.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bahar, A. Articles by Ahissar, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bahar, A. Articles by Ahissar, E.

Neural Signature of Taste Familiarity in the Gustatory Cortex of the Freely Behaving Rat

Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Submitted 1 March 2004; accepted in final form 13 June 2004

Ample data indicate that the gustatory cortex (GC) subserves the processing, encoding, and storage of taste information. To further elucidate the neural processes involved, we recorded multi-unit activity in the GC of the freely behaving rat as it became familiar with a novel tastant. Exposure to the tastant was performed over three 40- to 50-min sessions, 24 h apart. In each session, the tastant was presented repeatedly, 1 s at a time, with 10- to 12-s inter-trial intervals. The neural response to the tastant typically lasted 7 s. Our results show that the average neuronal response to the tastant increased as this tastant became familiar, but this increase was detected only during the last 5 s of the response. The increased response was not generalized to another tastant. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that specific neuronal populations subserve the processing of familiarity of specific tastants. The signature of familiarity was not detected in the course of the familiarization session, but only on the subsequent day, suggesting that its development involves slow post-acquisition processes. Our data are in line with the notion that GC neurons process multiple taste attributes, familiarity included, during different temporal phases of their response. The data also suggest that by default the brain considers a taste stimulus as novel, unless proven otherwise.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Merhav and K. Rosenblum Facilitation of taste memory acquisition by experiencing previous novel taste is protein-synthesis dependent Learn. Mem., July 14, 2008; 15(7): 501 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Verhagen and D. B. Katz More Time to Taste. Focus on "Variability in Responses and Temporal Coding of Tastants of Similar Quality in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract of the Rat" J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 413 - 414. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Shema, T. C. Sacktor, and Y. Dudai Rapid Erasure of Long-Term Memory Associations in the Cortex by an Inhibitor of PKM{zeta} Science, August 17, 2007; 317(5840): 951 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fontanini and D. B. Katz State-Dependent Modulation of Time-Varying Gustatory Responses J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3183 - 3193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Stapleton, M. L. Lavine, R. L. Wolpert, M. A. L. Nicolelis, and S. A. Simon Rapid Taste Responses in the Gustatory Cortex during Licking J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 4126 - 4138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Spector and S. P. Travers The representation of taste quality in the Mammalian nervous system. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 143 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]