JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 352-364, 2005. First published September 1, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00582.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/1/352    most recent
00582.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, Z.

Kinematic and Kinetic Constraints on Arm, Trunk, and Leg Segments in Target-Reaching Movements

James S. Thomas1, Daniel M. Corcos2 and Ziaul Hasan3

1School of Physical Therapy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio; 2Departments of Movement Sciences, Bioengineering, and Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, and Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago; and 3Departments of Movement Sciences and Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 6 June 2004; accepted in final form 30 August 2004

We studied target reaching tasks involving not only the arms but also the trunk and legs, which necessitated some trunk flexion. Such tasks can be successfully completed using an infinite number of combinations of segment motions due to the inherent kinematic redundancy with the excessive degrees of freedom (DOFs). Sagittal plane motions of six segments (shank, thigh, pelvis, trunk, humerus, and forearm) and dynamic torques of six joints (ankle, knee, hip, lumbar, shoulder, and elbow) were analyzed separately by principal component (PC) analyses to determine if there was a commonality among the shapes of the respective waveforms. Additionally, PC analyses were used to probe for constraining relationships among the 1) relative magnitudes of segment excursions and 2) the peak-to-peak dynamic joint torques. In summary, at the kinematic level, the tasks are simplified by the use of a single common waveform for all segment excursions with 89.9% variance accounted for (VAF), but with less fixed relationships among the relative scaling of the magnitude of segment excursions (62.2% VAF). However, at the kinetic level, the time course of the dynamic joint torques are not well captured by a single waveform (72.7% VAF), but the tasks are simplified by relatively fixed relationships among the scaling of dynamic joint torque magnitudes across task conditions (94.7% VAF). Taken together, these results indicate that, while the effective DOFs in a multi-joint task are reduced differently at the kinematic and kinetic levels, they both contribute to simplifying the neural control of these tasks.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. S. Thomas, Ohio Univ., School of Physical Therapy, W277 Grover Center, Athens, OH 45701 (E-mail: thomasj5{at}ohiou.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, A. d'Avella, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti
On the Origin of Planar Covariation of Elevation Angles During Human Locomotion
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1890 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Shemmell, M. Forner, J. R. Tresilian, S. Riek, B. K. Barry, and R. G. Carson
Neuromuscular Adaptation During Skill Acquisition on a Two Degree-of-Freedom Target-Acquisition Task: Isometric Torque Production
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3046 - 3057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.