HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 93/1/44    most recent 00586.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aksenov, D. P. Articles by Bracha, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aksenov, D. P. Articles by Bracha, V.

Glutamate Neurotransmission in the Cerebellar Interposed Nuclei: Involvement in Classically Conditioned Eyeblinks and Neuronal Activity

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

Submitted 8 June 2004; accepted in final form 19 August 2004

The cerebellar interposed nuclei (IN) are critical components of a neural network that controls the expression of classically conditioned eyeblinks. The IN receive 2 major inputs: the massive, -aminobutyric acid (GABA)–mediated input from the Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex and the relatively weaker, glutamate-mediated input from collaterals of mossy and climbing fiber cerebellar afferent systems. To elucidate the role of IN glutamate neurotransmission in conditioned response (CR) expression, effects of blocking fast glutamatergic neurotransmission in the IN with -D-glutamylglycine (DGG) on the expression of conditioned eyeblinks and on cerebellar nuclear neuronal activity were examined. Surprisingly, blocking fast glutamate receptors in the IN did not abolish CRs. DGG decreased CR incidence and slightly increased CR latency. In contrast, identical amounts of DGG applied to the cerebellar cortex abolished CRs. Similar to the behavioral effects, DGG had unexpectedly mild effects on IN neurons. At the population level, the baseline firing frequency of IN cells was not affected. After DGG injections, the incidence of excitatory modulation of cell activity in the interstimulus interval decreased but was not abolished. A combined block of fast glutamate and GABA_A neurotransmission using a mixture of DGG and picrotoxin dramatically reduced CR incidence, increased the firing frequency of all cell types, and virtually abolished all modulation of neuronal activity. These results indicate that fast glutamate neurotransmission in the IN plays only an accessory role both in the expression of behavioral CRs and in the generation of associated neuronal activity in the IN.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Z. Wetmore, E. A. Mukamel, and M. J. Schnitzer Lock-and-Key Mechanisms of Cerebellar Memory Recall Based on Rebound Currents J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2328 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.-A. Jirenhed, F. Bengtsson, and G. Hesslow Acquisition, Extinction, and Reacquisition of a Cerebellar Cortical Memory Trace J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2493 - 2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ohyama, W. L. Nores, J. F. Medina, F. A. Riusech, and M. D. Mauk Learning-Induced Plasticity in Deep Cerebellar Nucleus J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12656 - 12663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.-P. Chen and C. Evinger Cerebellar Modulation of Trigeminal Reflex Blinks: Interpositus Neurons J. Neurosci., October 11, 2006; 26(41): 10569 - 10576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]