JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 1042-1054, 2005. First published September 29, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00132.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/2/1042    most recent
00132.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.

Latencies of Climbing Fiber Inputs to Turtle Cerebellar Cortex

Michael Ariel

Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri

Submitted 9 February 2004; accepted in final form 23 September 2004

Responses of separate regions of rat cerebellar cortex (Cb) to inferior olive (IO) stimulation occur with the same latency despite large differences in climbing fiber (CF) lengths. Here, the olivocerebellar path of turtle was studied because its Cb is an unfoliated sheet on which measurements of latency and CF length can be made directly across its entire surface in vitro. During extracellular DC recordings at a given Cb position below the molecular layer, IO stimulation evoked a large negative field potential with a half-width duration of ~6.5 ms. On this response were smaller oscillations similar to complex spikes. The stimulating electrode was moved to map the IO and the CF path from the brain stem to the Cb. The contralateral brain stem region that evoked these responses was tightly circumscribed within the medulla, lateral and deep to the obex. This response remained when the brain stem was bathed in solutions that blocked synaptic transmission. The Cb response to IO stimulation had a peak latency of ~10 ms that was not dependent on the position of the recording electrode across the entire 8-mm rostrocaudal length of the Cb. However, for a constant Cb recording position, moving the stimulation across the midline to the ipsilateral brain stem and along the lateral wall of the fourth ventricle toward the peduncle did shorten the response latency. Therefore a synchronous Cb response to CF stimulation seems to be caused by changes in its conduction velocity within the entire cerebellar cortex but not within the brain stem.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Ariel, Dept. of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, St. Louis Univ., 1402 S. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63104 (E-mail: arielm{at}slu.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. E. Brown and M. Ariel
Topography and Response Timing of Intact Cerebellum Stained With Absorbance Voltage-Sensitive Dye
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 474 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. J. Lang, R. Llinas, and I. Sugihara
Isochrony in the olivocerebellar system underlies complex spike synchrony
J. Physiol., May 15, 2006; 573(1): 277 - 279.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.