|
|
||||||||
1Department of Neuromotor Physiology, Scientific Institute Foundation Santa Lucia, Rome; 2Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome; and 3Center of Space Bio-Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Submitted 13 August 2004; accepted in final form 24 September 2004
We studied how subjects learn to deal with two conflicting sensory environments as a function of the probability of each environment and the temporal distance between repeated events. Subjects were asked to intercept a visual target moving downward on a screen with randomized laws of motion. We compared five protocols that differed in the probability of constant speed (0g) targets and accelerated (1g) targets. Probability ranged from 9 to 100%, and the time interval between consecutive repetitions of the same target ranged from about 1 to 20 min. We found that subjects systematically timed their responses consistent with the assumption of gravity effects, for both 1 and 0g trials. With training, subjects rapidly adapted to 0g targets by shifting the time of motor activation. Surprisingly, the adaptation rate was independent of both the probability of 0g targets and their temporal distance. Very few 0g trials sporadically interspersed as catch trials during immersive practice with 1g trials were sufficient for learning and consolidation in long-term memory, as verified by retesting after 24 h. We argue that the memory store for adapted states of the internal gravity model is triggered by individual events and can be sustained for prolonged periods of time separating sporadic repetitions. This form of event-related learning could depend on multiple-stage memory, with exponential rise and decay in the initial stages followed by a sample-and-hold module.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. L. Miller, V. Maffei, G. Bosco, M. Iosa, M. Zago, E. Macaluso, and F. Lacquaniti Vestibular Nuclei and Cerebellum Put Visual Gravitational Motion in Context J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1969 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Brown, E. T. Wilson, M. A. Goodale, and P. L. Gribble Motor Force Field Learning Influences Visual Processing of Target Motion J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 9975 - 9983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Senot, M. Zago, F. Lacquaniti, and J. McIntyre Anticipating the Effects of Gravity When Intercepting Moving Objects: Differentiating Up and Down Based on Nonvisual Cues J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4471 - 4480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zago and F. Lacquaniti Internal Model of Gravity for Hand Interception: Parametric Adaptation to Zero-Gravity Visual Targets on Earth J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1346 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |