|
|
||||||||
INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY
1Neuroscience Department, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; 2Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and 3Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Submitted 8 July 2004; accepted in final form 23 August 2004
Multiple factors simultaneously affect the spiking activity of individual neurons. Determining the effects and relative importance of these factors is a challenging problem in neurophysiology. We propose a statistical framework based on the point process likelihood function to relate a neuron's spiking probability to three typical covariates: the neuron's own spiking history, concurrent ensemble activity, and extrinsic covariates such as stimuli or behavior. The framework uses parametric models of the conditional intensity function to define a neuron's spiking probability in terms of the covariates. The discrete time likelihood function for point processes is used to carry out model fitting and model analysis. We show that, by modeling the logarithm of the conditional intensity function as a linear combination of functions of the covariates, the discrete time point process likelihood function is readily analyzed in the generalized linear model (GLM) framework. We illustrate our approach for both GLM and non-GLM likelihood functions using simulated data and multivariate single-unit activity data simultaneously recorded from the motor cortex of a monkey performing a visuomotor pursuit-tracking task. The point process framework provides a flexible, computationally efficient approach for maximum likelihood estimation, goodness-of-fit assessment, residual analysis, model selection, and neural decoding. The framework thus allows for the formulation and analysis of point process models of neural spiking activity that readily capture the simultaneous effects of multiple covariates and enables the assessment of their relative importance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Gerstner and R. Naud How Good Are Neuron Models? Science, October 16, 2009; 326(5951): 379 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ostojic, N. Brunel, and V. Hakim How Connectivity, Background Activity, and Synaptic Properties Shape the Cross-Correlation between Spike Trains J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10234 - 10253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, V. Gilja, S. I. Ryu, A. Afshar, M. Sahani, and K. V. Shenoy Factor-Analysis Methods for Higher-Performance Neural Prostheses J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1315 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Yu, J. P. Cunningham, G. Santhanam, S. I. Ryu, K. V. Shenoy, and M. Sahani Gaussian-Process Factor Analysis for Low-Dimensional Single-Trial Analysis of Neural Population Activity J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 614 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Grun Data-Driven Significance Estimation for Precise Spike Correlation J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1126 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tateno and H.P.C. Robinson Integration of Broadband Conductance Input in Rat Somatosensory Cortical Inhibitory Interneurons: An Inhibition-Controlled Switch Between Intrinsic and Input-Driven Spiking in Fast-Spiking Cells J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1056 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bollimunta, Y. Chen, C. E. Schroeder, and M. Ding Neuronal Mechanisms of Cortical Alpha Oscillations in Awake-Behaving Macaques J. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 28(40): 9976 - 9988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Czanner, U. T. Eden, S. Wirth, M. Yanike, W. A. Suzuki, and E. N. Brown Analysis of Between-Trial and Within-Trial Neural Spiking Dynamics J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2672 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Truccolo, G. M. Friehs, J. P. Donoghue, and L. R. Hochberg Primary Motor Cortex Tuning to Intended Movement Kinematics in Humans with Tetraplegia J. Neurosci., January 30, 2008; 28(5): 1163 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Cohen, P. Pouget, G. F. Woodman, C. R. Subraveti, J. D. Schall, and A. F. Rossi Difficulty of Visual Search Modulates Neuronal Interactions and Response Variability in the Frontal Eye Field J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2580 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Srinivasan, U. T. Eden, S. K. Mitter, and E. N. Brown General-Purpose Filter Design for Neural Prosthetic Devices J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2456 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Hatsopoulos, Q. Xu, and Y. Amit Encoding of Movement Fragments in the Motor Cortex J. Neurosci., May 9, 2007; 27(19): 5105 - 5114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Townsend, L. Paninski, and R. N. Lemon Linear Encoding of Muscle Activity in Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellum J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2578 - 2592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Davies, G. L. Gerstein, and S. N. Baker Measurement of Time-Dependent Changes in the Irregularity of Neural Spiking J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 906 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Averbeck and D. Lee Effects of Noise Correlations on Information Encoding and Decoding J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3633 - 3644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Slee, M. H. Higgs, A. L. Fairhall, and W. J. Spain Two-Dimensional Time Coding in the Auditory Brainstem J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9978 - 9988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |