|
|
||||||||
REPORT
Departmento de Biofísica, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad National Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City D.F., Mexico
Submitted 2 June 2004; accepted in final form 6 September 2004
This work investigated if diverse properties could be ascribed to evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) recorded on rat neostriatal neurons when field stimulation was delivered at two different locations: the globus pallidus (GP) and the neostriatum (NS). Previous work stated that stimulation in the GP could antidromically excite projection axons from medium spiny neurons. This maneuver would predominantly activate the inhibitory synapses that interconnect spiny cells. In contrast, intrastriatal stimulation would preferentially activate inhibitory synapses provided by interneurons. This study shows that, in fact, intensity-amplitude experiments are able to reveal different properties for IPSCs evoked from these two locations (GP and NS). In addition, while all IPSCs evoked from the GP were always sensitive to
-conotoxin GVIA (CaV2.22.2 or N-channel blocker), one-half of the inhibition evoked from the NS exhibited little sensitivity to
-conotoxin GVIA. Characteristically, all
-conotoxin GVIAinsensitive IPSCs exhibited strong paired pulse depression, whereas
-conotoxin GVIAsensitive IPSCs evoked from either the GP or the NS could exhibit short-time depression or facilitation.
-Agatoxin TK (CaV2.12.1+ or P/Q-channel blocker) blocked IPSCs evoked from both locations. Therefore 1) distinct inhibitory inputs onto projection neostriatal cells can be differentially stimulated with field electrodes; 2) N-type Ca2+ channels are not equally expressed in inhibitory terminals activated in the NS; and 3) synapses that interconnect spiny neurons use both N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. P. Blomeley, L. A. Kehoe, and E. Bracci Substance P Mediates Excitatory Interactions between Striatal Projection Neurons J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4953 - 4963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shindou, G. W. Arbuthnott, and J. R. Wickens Actions of Adenosine A2A Receptors on Synaptic Connections of Spiny Projection Neurons in the Neostriatal Inhibitory Network J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1884 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Darbin and T. Wichmann Effects of Striatal GABAA-Receptor Blockade on Striatal and Cortical Activity in Monkeys J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1294 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tecuapetla, L. Carrillo-Reid, J. Bargas, and E. Galarraga Dopaminergic modulation of short-term synaptic plasticity at striatal inhibitory synapses PNAS, June 12, 2007; 104(24): 10258 - 10263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Salgado, F. Tecuapetla, T. Perez-Rosello, A. Perez-Burgos, E. Perez-Garci, E. Galarraga, and J. Bargas A Reconfiguration of CaV2 Ca2+ Channel Current and Its Dopaminergic D2 Modulation in Developing Neostriatal Neurons J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3771 - 3787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Perez-Rosello, A. Figueroa, H. Salgado, C. Vilchis, F. Tecuapetla, J. N. Guzman, E. Galarraga, and J. Bargas Cholinergic Control of Firing Pattern and Neurotransmission in Rat Neostriatal Projection Neurons: Role of CaV2.1 and CaV2.2 Ca2+ Channels J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2507 - 2519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |