HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 93/3/1165    most recent 00966.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haque, A. Articles by Dickman, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haque, A. Articles by Dickman, J. D.

Vestibular Gaze Stabilization: Different Behavioral Strategies for Arboreal and Terrestrial Avians

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 16 September 2004; accepted in final form 23 October 2004

In birds, it is thought that head movements play a major role in the reflexive stabilization of gaze and vision. In this study, we investigated the contributions of the eye and head to gaze stabilization during rotations under both head-fixed [vestibuloocular (VOR)] and head-free conditions in two avian species: pigeons and quails. These two species differ both in ocular anatomy (the pigeon has 2 distinct foveal regions), as well as in behavioral repertoires. Pigeons are arboreal, fly extended distances, and can navigate. Quails are primarily engrossed in terrestrial niches and fly only short distances. Unlike the head-fixed VOR gains that were under-compensatory for both species, gaze gains under head-free conditions were completely compensatory at high frequencies. This compensation was achieved primarily with head movements in pigeons, but with combined head and eye-in-head contributions in the quail. In contrast, eye-in-head motion, which was significantly reduced for head-free compared with head-fixed conditions, contributed very little to overall gaze stability in pigeons. These results suggest that disparity between the stabilization strategies employed by these two birds may be attributed to differences in species-specific behavior and anatomy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. McArthur and J. D. Dickman Canal and Otolith Contributions to Compensatory Tilt Responses in Pigeons J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1488 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Haque, M. Zakir, and J. D. Dickman Recovery of Gaze Stability During Vestibular Regeneration J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 853 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Haque, D. Huss, and J. D. Dickman Afferent Innervation Patterns of the Pigeon Horizontal Crista Ampullaris J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3293 - 3304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Maurice, H. Gioanni, and A. Abourachid Influence of the behavioural context on the optocollic reflex (OCR) in pigeons (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 292 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]