| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Centre for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; 2Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; and 3National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Submitted 25 May 2004; accepted in final form 10 October 2004
It is an essential feature for the visual system to keep track of self-motion to maintain space constancy. Therefore the saccadic system uses extraretinal information about previous saccades to update the internal representation of memorized targets, an ability that has been identified in behavioral and electrophysiological studies. However, a smooth eye movement induced in the latency period of a memory-guided saccade yielded contradictory results. Indeed some studies described spatially accurate saccades, whereas others reported retinal coding of saccades. Today, it is still unclear how the saccadic system keeps track of smooth eye movements in the absence of vision. Here, we developed an original two-dimensional behavioral paradigm to further investigate how smooth eye displacements could be compensated to ensure space constancy. Human subjects were required to pursue a moving target and to orient their eyes toward the memorized position of a briefly presented second target (flash) once it appeared. The analysis of the first orientation saccade revealed a bimodal latency distribution related to two different saccade programming strategies. Short-latency (<175 ms) saccades were coded using the only available retinal information, i.e., position error. In addition to position error, longer-latency (>175 ms) saccades used extraretinal information about the smooth eye displacement during the latency period to program spatially more accurate saccades. Sensory parameters at the moment of the flash (retinal position error and eye velocity) influenced the choice between both strategies. We hypothesize that this tradeoff between speed and accuracy of the saccadic response reveals the presence of two coupled neural pathways for saccadic programming. A fast striatal-collicular pathway might only use retinal information about the flash location to program the first saccade. The slower pathway could involve the posterior parietal cortex to update the internal representation of the flash once extraretinal smooth eye displacement information becomes available to the system.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. de'Sperati and G. Baud-Bovy Blind Saccades: An Asynchrony between Seeing and Looking J. Neurosci., April 23, 2008; 28(17): 4317 - 4321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-J. Orban de Xivry and P. Lefevre Saccades and pursuit: two outcomes of a single sensorimotor process J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 11 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Q. Xiao, A. Barborica, and V. P. Ferrera Modulation of Visual Responses in Macaque Frontal Eye Field during Covert Tracking of Invisible Targets Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 918 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-J. Orban de Xivry, S. J. Bennett, P. Lefevre, and G. R. Barnes Evidence for Synergy Between Saccades and Smooth Pursuit During Transient Target Disappearance J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 418 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Blohm, M. Missal, and P. Lefevre Direct Evidence for a Position Input to the Smooth Pursuit System J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 712 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
