HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 93/3/1633    most recent 00383.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hess, B. J. M. Articles by Misslisch, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hess, B. J. M. Articles by Misslisch, H.

Canal–Otolith Interactions After Off-Vertical Axis Rotations. II. Spatiotemporal Properties of Roll and Pitch Postrotatory Vestibuloocular Reflexes

Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Submitted 14 April 2004; accepted in final form 31 October 2004

We have examined the spatiotemporal characteristics of postrotatory eye velocity after roll and pitch off-vertical axis rotations (OVAR). Three rhesus monkeys were placed in one of 3 orientations on a 3-dimensional (3D) turntable: upright (90° roll or pitch OVAR), 45° nose-up (45° roll OVAR), and 45° left ear-down (45° pitch OVAR). Subjects were then rotated at ±60°/s around the naso-occipital or interaural axis and stopped after 10 turns, in one of 7 final head orientations, each separated by 30°. We found that postrotatory eye velocity showed horizontal–vertical components after roll OVAR and horizontal–torsional components after pitch OVAR that varied systematically as a function of final head orientation. The quantitative analysis suggests that, in contrast to the analogous yaw OVAR paradigm, a system of up to 3 real, gravity-dependent eigenvectors and eigenvalues determines the spatiotemporal characteristics of the residual eye velocities after roll and pitch OVAR. One of these eigenvectors closely aligned with gravity, whereas the other 2 determined the orientation of the earth horizontal plane. We propose that the spatial characteristics of eye velocity after roll and pitch OVAR follow the physical constraints of stationary orientation in a gravitational field and reflect the brain’s best estimate of head-in-space orientation within an internal representation of 3D space.