JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 2797-2808, 2005. First published December 29, 2004; doi:10.1152/jn.00858.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/5/2797    most recent
00858.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Leigh, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Leigh, R. J.

Directional Asymmetry During Combined Saccade–Vergence Movements

Arun N. Kumar1, Yanning Han1, Louis F. Dell'osso1,2, Dominique M. Durand1 and R. John Leigh1,2

1Departments of Biomedical Engineering and 2Neurology, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Submitted 19 August 2004; accepted in final form 21 December 2004

We investigated relationships between saccadic and vergence components of gaze shifts as 10 human subjects switched visual fixation between targets aligned in the midsagittal plane that lay in different vertical directions and at different distances. When fixation was shifted between a higher distant target and a lower near target, peak convergence velocity followed peak vertical saccadic velocity by a median interval of 12 ms. However, when fixation was shifted between a lower distant target and a higher near target, peak convergence velocity followed peak vertical saccadic velocity by a median interval of 76 ms. For the 2 stimulus arrangements, the median intervals by which peak divergence velocity followed the peak vertical saccadic velocity were 4 and 20 ms, respectively. The dissociation interval between the peak velocities of convergence and upward saccades increased with vertical saccade size, required convergence angle, and elevation of the endpoint of the movement. Velocity waveforms of vergence responses were more skewed when peak velocity was closely associated with saccadic peak velocity than when the vergence responses were delayed. Convergence peak velocities did not vary in any consistent pattern, but divergence peak velocities were generally smaller with responses that were delayed. Vergence movements were accompanied by small, high-frequency conjugate oscillations, suggesting that omnipause neurons were inhibited for both types of responses. In conclusion, the present findings indicate that the dynamic properties of horizontal vergence movements depend on the direction and timing of vertical saccades; these findings suggest experimental tests for current models of saccade–vergence interaction.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. J. Leigh, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-5040 (E-mail: rjl4{at}case.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. R. Van Horn, P. A. Sylvestre, and K. E. Cullen
The Brain Stem Saccadic Burst Generator Encodes Gaze in Three-Dimensional Space
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2602 - 2616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.