|
|
||||||||
1Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University; 2New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York
Submitted 8 October 2004; accepted in final form 23 November 2004
In the cat, the motor representation in motor cortex develops between wk 8 and wk 13. Motor map development is accompanied by a decrease in the current thresholds for evoking movements with a concomitant increase in the number of effective sites, an increase in the distal representation, and the representation of multijoint synergies. In this study we used intracortical microstimulation in anesthetized cats to examine how forelimb motor experiences influence development of map characteristics. To promote skilled movements during wks 813, animals were engaged in daily performance of a prehension task. Forelimb movements were prevented by intramuscular botulinum toxin injection or restraint. To determine whether experience-dependent changes were permanent, we examined the map in different animals between 1 wk and 1 yr after cessation of testing. Promoting forelimb use resulted in an increase in the number of sites from which multiple joint effects were produced by stimulation and the number of joints represented at those sites. The effect was maximal at 1 wk after cessation of testing, and became progressively less at 1 mo and at 4 mo. Preventing limb use resulted in a decreased number of effective sites, an increase in current thresholds for evoking responses, and a decreased representation of joints at multijoint sites. Our findings show that the motor map can respond to novel motor demands as it is forming during development but that it reverts back to one with the properties of a map in a control animal if those demands are not maintained in the animal's behavioral repertoire.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C Heathcock, M. Lobo, and J. C Galloway Movement Training Advances the Emergence of Reaching in Infants Born at Less Than 33 Weeks of Gestational Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, March 1, 2008; 88(3): 310 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S.A. Graziano and T. N. Aflalo Rethinking Cortical Organization: Moving Away from Discrete Areas Arranged in Hierarchies Neuroscientist, April 1, 2007; 13(2): 138 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. N. Aflalo and M. S. A. Graziano Possible origins of the complex topographic organization of motor cortex: reduction of a multidimensional space onto a two-dimensional array. J. Neurosci., June 7, 2006; 26(23): 6288 - 6297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Cramer, L. Lastra, M. G. Lacourse, and M. J. Cohen Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury Brain, December 1, 2005; 128(12): 2941 - 2950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chakrabarty and J. H. Martin Motor But Not Sensory Representation in Motor Cortex Depends on Postsynaptic Activity During Development and in Maturity J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3192 - 3198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |