HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 93/5/3016    most recent 01176.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Isoda, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Isoda, M.

REPORT

Context-Dependent Stimulation Effects on Saccade Initiation in the Presupplementary Motor Area of the Monkey

Department of Physiology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai; and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Program, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi Japan

Submitted 15 November 2004; accepted in final form 8 February 2005

Although evidence suggests that the contribution of the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) to voluntary motor control is effector-nonselective, the question of how electrical stimulation of the pre-SMA affects eye movements remains unanswered. To address this issue, stimulus effects of the pre-SMA of monkeys on saccade initiation were investigated during performance of a visually guided saccade task with an instructed delay period. This report describes two major findings. First, when stimuli with currents of 80 µA were applied before the presentation of a GO signal, the reaction time (RT) of an upcoming saccade shortened with comparable effects on ipsi- and contraversive saccades. Second, stimuli that were delivered after the GO signal lengthened the RT; this resulted in greater effects on ipsiversive saccades. In addition, the stimulation yielded a mild impairment of saccade accuracy, particularly when the stimulation was delivered after the GO signal. By themselves, however, these stimuli did not directly elicit eye movements. Therefore the stimulus effects appeared only in the context of the behavioral task and were dependent on the phase of the task. These findings provide additional support for the hypothesis that the involvement of the pre-SMA in motor control can be linked to either eye or arm motor system dependent on behavioral context.