|
|
||||||||
1Department of Technology, Computational Neuroscience, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; and 2Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Submitted 19 October 2004; accepted in final form 27 January 2005
Recent neurophysiological experiments have led to a promising "biased competition hypothesis" of the neural basis of attention. According to this hypothesis, attention appears as a sometimes nonlinear property that results from a top-down biasing effect that influences the competitive and cooperative interactions that work both within cortical areas and between cortical areas. In this paper we describe a detailed dynamical analysis of the synaptic and neuronal spiking mechanisms underlying biased competition. We perform a detailed analysis of the dynamical capabilities of the system by exploring the stationary attractors in the parameter space by a mean-field reduction consistent with the underlying synaptic and spiking dynamics. The nonstationary dynamical behavior, as measured in neuronal recording experiments, is studied by an integrate-and-fire model with realistic dynamics. This elucidates the role of cooperation and competition in the dynamics of biased competition and shows why feedback connections between cortical areas need optimally to be weaker by a factor of about 2.5 than the feedforward connections in an attentional network. We modeled the interaction between top-down attention and bottom-up stimulus contrast effects found neurophysiologically and showed that top-down attentional effects can be explained by external attention inputs biasing neurons to move to different parts of their nonlinear activation functions. Further, it is shown that, although NMDA nonlinear effects may be useful in attention, they are not necessary, with nonlinear effects (which may appear multiplicative) being produced in the way just described.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Shipp, D. L. Adams, K. Moutoussis, and S. Zeki Feature Binding in the Feedback Layers of Area V2 Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 2230 - 2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T Rolls Functional neuroimaging of umami taste: what makes umami pleasant? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2009; 90(3): 804S - 813S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Michler, R. Eckhorn, and T. Wachtler Using Spatiotemporal Correlations to Learn Topographic Maps for Invariant Object Recognition J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 953 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Borgers, S. Epstein, and N. J. Kopell Gamma oscillations mediate stimulus competition and attentional selection in a cortical network model PNAS, November 18, 2008; 105(46): 18023 - 18028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Buehlmann and G. Deco The Neuronal Basis of Attention: Rate versus Synchronization Modulation J. Neurosci., July 23, 2008; 28(30): 7679 - 7686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Grabenhorst, E. T. Rolls, and A. Bilderbeck How Cognition Modulates Affective Responses to Taste and Flavor: Top-down Influences on the Orbitofrontal and Pregenual Cingulate Cortices Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1549 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2158 - 2182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deco, M. Perez-Sanagustin, V. de Lafuente, and R. Romo Perceptual detection as a dynamical bistability phenomenon: A neurocomputational correlate of sensation PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 20073 - 20077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deco, L. Scarano, and S. Soto-Faraco Weber's Law in Decision Making: Integrating Behavioral Data in Humans with a Neurophysiological Model J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11192 - 11200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ardid, X.-J. Wang, and A. Compte An Integrated Microcircuit Model of Attentional Processing in the Neocortex J. Neurosci., August 8, 2007; 27(32): 8486 - 8495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |