HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/1/395    most recent 01168.2004v2 01168.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miyazaki, M. Articles by Nakajima, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miyazaki, M. Articles by Nakajima, Y.

Testing Bayesian Models of Human Coincidence Timing

¹Department of Rehabilitation for Sensory Functions and ²Department of Rehabilitation for Movement Functions, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Submitted 11 November 2004; accepted in final form 13 February 2005

A sensorimotor control task often requires an accurate estimation of the timing of the arrival of an external target (e.g., when hitting a pitched ball). Conventional studies of human timing processes have ignored the stochastic features of target timing: e.g., the speed of the pitched ball is not generally constant, but is variable. Interestingly, based on Bayesian theory, it has been recently shown that the human sensorimotor system achieves the optimal estimation by integrating sensory information with prior knowledge of the probabilistic structure of the target variation. In this study, we tested whether Bayesian integration is also implemented while performing a coincidence-timing type of sensorimotor task by manipulating the trial-by-trial variability (i.e., the prior distribution) of the target timing. As a result, within several hundred trials of learning, subjects were able to generate systematic timing behavior according to the width of the prior distribution, as predicted by the optimal Bayesian model. Considering the previous studies showing that the human sensorimotor system uses Bayesian integration in spacing and force-grading tasks, our result indicates that Bayesian integration is fundamental to all aspects of human sensorimotor control. Moreover, it was noteworthy that the subjects could adjust their behavior both when the prior distribution was switched from wide to narrow and vice versa, although the adjustment was slower in the former case. Based on a comparison with observations in a previous study, we discuss the flexibility and adaptability of Bayesian sensorimotor learning.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Franklin and D. M. Wolpert Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14165 - 14175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pressman, L. J. Welty, A. Karniel, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Perception of Delayed Stiffness The International Journal of Robotics Research, November 1, 2007; 26(11-12): 1191 - 1203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Tassinari, T. E. Hudson, and M. S. Landy Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task J. Neurosci., October 4, 2006; 26(40): 10154 - 10163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]