HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/1/400    most recent 01065.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dasika, V. K. Articles by Colburn, H. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dasika, V. K. Articles by Colburn, H. S.

Effects of Inhibitory Feedback in a Network Model of Avian Brain Stem

¹Department of Biomedical Engineering, ²Hearing Research Center, ³Center for BioDynamics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and ⁴Departments of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York

Submitted 12 October 2004; accepted in final form 27 February 2005

The avian auditory brain stem consists of a network of specialized nuclei, including nucleus laminaris (NL) and superior olivary nucleus (SON). NL cells show sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD), a critical cue that underlies spatial hearing. SON cells provide inhibitory feedback to the rest of the network. Empirical data suggest that feedback inhibition from SON could increase the ITD sensitivity of NL across sound level. Using a bilateral network model, we assess the effects of SON feedback inhibition. Individual cells are specified as modified leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons with time constants and thresholds that vary with inhibitory input. Acoustic sound level is reflected in the discharge rates of the model auditory-nerve fibers, which innervate the network. Simulations show that with SON inhibitory feedback, ITD sensitivity is maintained in model NL cells over a threefold range in auditory-nerve discharge rate. In contrast, without SON feedback inhibition, ITD sensitivity is significantly reduced as input rates are increased. Feedback inhibition is most beneficial in maintaining ITD sensitivity at high-input rates (simulating high sound levels). With SON inhibition, ITD sensitivity is maintained for both interaurally balanced inputs (simulating an on-center sound source) and interaurally imbalanced inputs (simulating a lateralized source). Further, the empirically observed temporal build-up of SON inhibition and the presence of reciprocal inhibitory connections between the ipsi- and contralateral SON both improve ITD sensitivity. In sum, our network model shows that inhibitory feedback can substantially increase the sensitivity and dynamic range of ITD coding in the avian auditory brain stem.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Nishino, R. Yamada, H. Kuba, H. Hioki, T. Furuta, T. Kaneko, and H. Ohmori Sound-Intensity-Dependent Compensation for the Small Interaural Time Difference Cue for Sound Source Localization J. Neurosci., July 9, 2008; 28(28): 7153 - 7164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pecka, A. Brand, O. Behrend, and B. Grothe Interaural Time Difference Processing in the Mammalian Medial Superior Olive: The Role of Glycinergic Inhibition J. Neurosci., July 2, 2008; 28(27): 6914 - 6925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. K. Dasika, J. A. White, and H. S. Colburn Simple Models Show the General Advantages of Dendrites in Coincidence Detection J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3449 - 3459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ashida, K. Abe, K. Funabiki, and M. Konishi Passive Soma Facilitates Submillisecond Coincidence Detection in the Owl's Auditory System J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2267 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Lu Endogenous mGluR Activity Suppresses GABAergic Transmission in Avian Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis Neurons J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1018 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]