HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/1/519    most recent 00043.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rabbah, P. Articles by Nadim, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rabbah, P. Articles by Nadim, F.

Effect of Electrical Coupling on Ionic Current and Synaptic Potential Measurements

¹Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University; and ²Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey

Submitted 12 January 2005; accepted in final form 21 February 2005

Recent studies have found electrical coupling to be more ubiquitous than previously thought, and coupling through gap junctions is known to play a crucial role in neuronal function and network output. In particular, current spread through gap junctions may affect the activation of voltage-dependent conductances as well as chemical synaptic release. Using voltage-clamp recordings of two strongly electrically coupled neurons of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion and conductance-based models of these neurons, we identified effects of electrical coupling on the measurement of leak and voltage-gated outward currents, as well as synaptic potentials. Experimental measurements showed that both leak and voltage-gated outward currents are recruited by gap junctions from neurons coupled to the clamped cell. Nevertheless, in spite of the strong coupling between these neurons, the errors made in estimating voltage-gated conductance parameters were relatively minor (<10%). Thus in many cases isolation of coupled neurons may not be required if a small degree of measurement error of the voltage-gated currents or the synaptic potentials is acceptable. Modeling results show, however, that such errors may be as high as 20% if the gap-junction position is near the recording site or as high as 90% when measuring smaller voltage-gated ionic currents. Paradoxically, improved space clamp increases the errors arising from electrical coupling because voltage control across gap junctions is poor for even the highest realistic coupling conductances. Furthermore, the common procedure of leak subtraction can add an extra error to the conductance measurement, the sign of which depends on the maximal conductance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Gansert, J. Golowasch, and F. Nadim Sustained Rhythmic Activity in Gap-Junctionally Coupled Networks of Model Neurons Depends on the Diameter of Coupled Dendrites J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3450 - 3460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Khorkova and J. Golowasch Neuromodulators, Not Activity, Control Coordinated Expression of Ionic Currents J. Neurosci., August 8, 2007; 27(32): 8709 - 8718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Nadim and J. Golowasch Signal Transmission Between Gap-Junctionally Coupled Passive Cables Is Most Effective at an Optimal Diameter J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3831 - 3843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Rabbah and F. Nadim Synaptic Dynamics Do Not Determine Proper Phase of Activity in a Central Pattern Generator J. Neurosci., December 7, 2005; 25(49): 11269 - 11278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]