JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 699-711, 2005. First published February 23, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01125.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/699    most recent
01125.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinfeld, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinfeld, D.

Activation of Nucleus Basalis Facilitates Cortical Control of a Brain Stem Motor Program

Rune W. Berg1, Beth Friedman2, Lee F. Schroeder3 and David Kleinfeld1,3

1Department of Physics, 2Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, and 3Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California

Submitted 1 November 2004; accepted in final form 16 February 2005

We tested the hypothesis that activation of nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM), which provides cholinergic input to cortex, facilitates motor control. Our measures of facilitation were changes in the direction and time-course of vibrissa movements that are elicited by microstimulation of vibrissa motor (M1) cortex. In particular, microstimulation led solely to a transient retraction of the vibrissae in the sessile animal but to a full motion sequence of protraction followed by retraction in the aroused animal. We observed that activation of NBM, as assayed by cortical desynchronization, induced a transition from microstimulation-evoked retraction to full sweep sequences. This dramatic change in the vibrissa response to microstimulation was blocked by systemic delivery of atropine and, in anesthetized animals, an analogous change was blocked by the topical administration of atropine to M1 cortex. We conclude that NBM significantly facilitates the ability of M1 cortex to control movements. Our results bear on the importance of cholinergic activation in schemes for neuroprosthetic control of movement.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Kleinfeld, Dept. of Physics 0374, Univ. of California, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 (E-mail: dk{at}physics.ucsd.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Melzer, R. N. S. Sachdev, N. Jenkinson, and F. F. Ebner
Stimulus Frequency Processing in Awake Rat Barrel Cortex.
J. Neurosci., November 22, 2006; 26(47): 12198 - 12205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. W. Berg, D. Whitmer, and D. Kleinfeld
Exploratory whisking by rat is not phase locked to the hippocampal theta rhythm.
J. Neurosci., June 14, 2006; 26(24): 6518 - 6522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. R. Aguilar and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Spatiotemporal Gating of Sensory Inputs in Thalamus during Quiescent and Activated States
J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10990 - 11002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.