JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 94: 764-774, 2005. First published March 2, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01052.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/764    most recent
01052.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Praamstra, P.
Right arrow Articles by Humphreys, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Praamstra, P.
Right arrow Articles by Humphreys, G. W.

Frontoparietal Control of Spatial Attention and Motor Intention in Human EEG

Peter Praamstra1,2, Luc Boutsen1 and Glyn W. Humphreys1

1Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre and 2Department of Clinical Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Submitted 6 October 2004; accepted in final form 22 February 2005

Relations between spatial attention and motor intention were investigated by means of an EEG potential elicited by shifting attention to a location in space as well as by the selection of a hand for responding. High-density recordings traced this potential to a common frontoparietal network activated by attentional orienting and by response selection. Within this network, parietal and frontal cortex were activated sequentially, followed by an anterior-to-posterior migration of activity culminating in the lateral occipital cortex. Based on temporal and polarity information provided by EEG, we hypothesize that the frontoparietal activation, evoked by directional information, updates a task-defined preparatory state by deselecting or inhibiting the behavioral option competing with the cued response side or the cued direction of attention. These results from human EEG demonstrate a direct EEG manifestation of the frontoparietal attention network previously identified in functional imaging. EEG reveals the time-course of activation within this network and elucidates the generation and function of associated directing-attention EEG potentials. The results emphasize transient activation and a decision-related function of the frontoparietal attention network, contrasting with the sustained preparatory activation that is commonly inferred from neuroimaging.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Praamstra, Behavioural Brain Sciences Ctr., School of Psychology, Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK (E-mail: p.praamstra{at}bham.ac.uk)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
B.C.M. van Wijk, A. Daffertshofer, N. Roach, and P. Praamstra
A Role of Beta Oscillatory Synchrony in Biasing Response Competition?
Cereb Cortex, October 3, 2008; (2008) bhn174v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
E. S. Cross, P. J. Schmitt, and S. T. Grafton
Neural Substrates of Contextual Interference during Motor Learning Support a Model of Active Preparation.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1854 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.