HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/1/799    most recent 01139.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xing, D. Articles by Ringach, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xing, D. Articles by Ringach, D. L.

Effect of Stimulus Size on the Dynamics of Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1

¹Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York; and ²Departments of Neurobiology, Psychology, and Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Submitted 5 November 2004; accepted in final form 15 February 2005

Previous research has established that orientation selectivity depends to a great extent on suppressive mechanisms in the visual cortex. In this study, we investigated the spatial organization and the time-course of these mechanisms. Stimuli were presented in circular windows of "optimal" and "large" radii. The two stimulus sizes were chosen based on an area-response function measured with drifting gratings at high contrast. The "optimal" size was defined as the smallest radius that elicited the peak response (average value of 0.45°), whereas "large" was defined as two to five times the optimal size. We found that the peak amplitude of tuned enhancement and untuned suppression varied <10% on average with stimulus radius, indicating that they are mainly concentrated in the classical receptive field. However, tuned suppression—in those cells that showed it—was significantly stronger with large stimuli, indicating that this component has a contribution from beyond the classical receptive field. These results imply that spatial context (in large stimuli) enhances orientation selectivity by increasing tuned suppression. We also characterized the time evolution of enhancement, of untuned suppression, and of tuned suppression. The time-course of tuned suppression was markedly slower in time-to-peak and longer in its persistence than untuned suppression. Therefore tuned suppression is likely to be generated by long-range recurrent connections or cortico-cortical feedback, whereas untuned suppression is mainly generated locally in V1.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Malone and D. L. Ringach Dynamics of Tuning in the Fourier Domain J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 239 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Smith, R. C. Kelly, and T. S. Lee Dynamics of Response to Perceptual Pop-Out Stimuli in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3436 - 3449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Ruksenas, A. Bulatov, and P. Heggelund Dynamics of Spatial Resolution of Single Units in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cat During Brief Visual Stimulation J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1445 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Malone, V. R. Kumar, and D. L. Ringach Dynamics of Receptive Field Size in Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Smith, W. Bair, and J. A. Movshon Dynamics of suppression in macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci., May 3, 2006; 26(18): 4826 - 4834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Mareschal, S. C. Dakin, and P. J. Bex Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images PNAS, March 28, 2006; 103(13): 5131 - 5136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]