JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 1048-1056, 2005. First published April 20, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01276.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/1048    most recent
01276.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freed, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freed, M. A.

Quantal Encoding of Information in a Retinal Ganglion Cell

Michael A. Freed

Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 13 December 2004; accepted in final form 14 April 2005

A retinal ganglion cell receives information about a white-noise stimulus as a flickering pattern of glutamate quanta. The ganglion cell reencodes this information as brief bursts of one to six spikes separated by quiescent periods. When the stimulus is repeated, the number of spikes in a burst is highly reproducible (variance < mean) and spike timing is precise to within 10 ms, leading to an estimate that each spike encodes about 2 bits. To understand how the ganglion cell reencodes information, we studied the quantal patterns by repeating a white-noise stimulus and recording excitatory currents from a voltage-clamped, brisk-sustained ganglion cell. Quanta occurred in synchronous bursts of 3 to 65; the resulting postsynaptic currents summed to form excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). The number of quanta in an EPSC was only moderately reproducible (variance = mean), quantal timing was precise to within 14 ms, and each quantum encoded 0.1–0.4 bit. In conclusion, compared to a spike, a quantum has similar temporal precision, but is less reproducible and encodes less information. Summing multiple quanta into discrete EPSCs improves the reproducibility of the overall quantal pattern and contributes to the reproducibility of the spike train.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. Freed, 123 Anatomy–Chemistry Bldg., University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6058 (E-mail: michael{at}retina.anatomy.upenn.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel
Benefits of Contrast Normalization Demonstrated in Neurons and Model Cells
J. Neurosci., July 25, 2007; 27(30): 8071 - 8079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. Margolis and P. B. Detwiler
Different Mechanisms Generate Maintained Activity in ON and OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells
J. Neurosci., May 30, 2007; 27(22): 5994 - 6005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.