HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/2/1180    most recent 01112.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lane, C. C. Articles by Delgutte, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lane, C. C. Articles by Delgutte, B.

Neural Correlates and Mechanisms of Spatial Release From Masking: Single-Unit and Population Responses in the Inferior Colliculus

¹Eaton–Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston; ²Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Harvard–Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge; and ³Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Submitted 26 October 2004; accepted in final form 24 April 2005

Spatial release from masking (SRM), a factor in listening in noisy environments, is the improvement in auditory signal detection obtained when a signal is separated in space from a masker. To study the neural mechanisms of SRM, we recorded from single units in the inferior colliculus (IC) of barbiturate-anesthetized cats, focusing on low-frequency neurons sensitive to interaural time differences. The stimulus was a broadband chirp train with a 40-Hz repetition rate in continuous broadband noise, and the unit responses were measured for several signal and masker (virtual) locations. Masked thresholds (the lowest signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, for which the signal could be detected for 75% of the stimulus presentations) changed systematically with signal and masker location. Single-unit thresholds did not necessarily improve with signal and masker separation; instead, they tended to reflect the units' azimuth preference. Both how the signal was detected (through a rate increase or decrease) and how the noise masked the signal response (suppressive or excitatory masking) changed with signal and masker azimuth, consistent with a cross-correlator model of binaural processing. However, additional processing, perhaps related to the signal's amplitude modulation rate, appeared to influence the units' responses. The population masked thresholds (the most sensitive unit's threshold at each signal and masker location) did improve with signal and masker separation as a result of the variety of azimuth preferences in our unit sample. The population thresholds were similar to human behavioral thresholds in both SNR value and shape, indicating that these units may provide a neural substrate for low-frequency SRM.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Siveke, C. Leibold, and B. Grothe Spectral Composition of Concurrent Noise Affects Neuronal Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences of Tones in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2705 - 2715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. V. Seshagiri and B. Delgutte Response Properties of Neighboring Neurons in the Auditory Midbrain for Pure-Tone Stimulation: A Tetrode Study J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2058 - 2073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]