HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/3/2182    most recent 00278.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Karmeier, K. Articles by Egelhaaf, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Karmeier, K. Articles by Egelhaaf, M.

Population Coding of Self-Motion: Applying Bayesian Analysis to a Population of Visual Interneurons in the Fly

¹Bielefeld University, Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie, Bielefeld, Germany; and ²Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Submitted 15 March 2005; accepted in final form 17 May 2005

Coding of sensory information often involves the activity of neuronal populations. We demonstrate how the accuracy of a population code depends on integration time, the size of the population, and noise correlation between the participating neurons. The population we study consists of 10 identified visual interneurons in the blowfly Calliphora vicina involved in optic flow processing. These neurons are assumed to encode the animal's head or body rotations around horizontal axes by means of graded potential changes. From electrophysiological experiments we obtain parameters for modeling the neurons' responses. From applying a Bayesian analysis on the modeled population response we draw three major conclusions. First, integration of neuronal activities over a time period of only 5 ms after response onset is sufficient to decode accurately the rotation axis. Second, noise correlation between neurons has only little impact on the population's performance. And third, although a population of only two neurons would be sufficient to encode any horizontal rotation axis, the population of 10 vertical system neurons is advantageous if the available integration time is short. For the fly, short integration times to decode neuronal responses are important when controlling rapid flight maneuvers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Cuntz, J. Haag, F. Forstner, I. Segev, and A. Borst Robust coding of flow-field parameters by axo-axonal gap junctions between fly visual interneurons PNAS, June 12, 2007; 104(24): 10229 - 10233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Straw, E. J. Warrant, and D. C. O'Carroll A `bright zone' in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4339 - 4354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Grewe, N. Matos, M. Egelhaaf, and A.-K. Warzecha Implications of Functionally Different Synaptic Inputs for Neuronal Gain and Computational Properties of Fly Visual Interneurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1838 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Karmeier, J. H. van Hateren, R. Kern, and M. Egelhaaf Encoding of Naturalistic Optic Flow by a Population of Blowfly Motion-Sensitive Neurons J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1602 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kalb, M. Egelhaaf, and R. Kurtz Robust integration of motion information in the fly visual system revealed by single cell photoablation. J. Neurosci., July 26, 2006; 26(30): 7898 - 7906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]