JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 2295-2311, 2005. First published May 25, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.01336.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/2295    most recent
01336.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Busettini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mays, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Busettini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mays, L. E.

Saccade–Vergence Interactions in Macaques. I. Test of the Omnipause Multiply Model

C. Busettini and L. E. Mays

Department of Vision Sciences and Vision Science Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Submitted 27 December 2004; accepted in final form 18 May 2005

Horizontal vergence eye movements are movements in opposite directions used to change fixation between far and near targets. The occurrence of a saccade during vergence causes vergence velocity to be transiently enhanced. The goal of this study was to test in the monkey the previously described Multiply Model (Zee et al. 1992) that holds that, in humans, the speeding of vergence during a saccade may be the result of the disinhibition of a subgroup of vergence-related neurons by the saccadic omnipause neurons (OPNs). In agreement with the Multiply Model: 1) the onset of the enhancement was closely related to saccadic onset, and thus linked to the onset of the OPN pause; 2) the magnitude of the vergence velocity enhancement was strongly dependent on saccade–vergence timing. Contrary to the Multiply Model: 1) the peak of the vergence velocity enhancement was dependent on saccadic peak velocity; 2) the dependency on saccadic peak velocity was not the indirect result of a dependency on saccadic duration and therefore on the duration of the OPN pause; 3) the decline of the vergence enhancement, identified by the time of the peak of the enhancement velocity, occurred too early to be linked to the end of the OPN pause; 4) vergence enhancement had a saccadic-like peak-velocity/size main sequence. Overall, the evidence is incompatible with the OPN Multiply hypothesis of vergence enhancement. Alternative models are described in an accompanying paper.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Busettini, Vision Science Research Center, 654 Worrell Bldg., 924 18th St. South, Birmingham, AL 35294-4390 (E-mail: cbus{at}uab.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. R. Van Horn, P. A. Sylvestre, and K. E. Cullen
The Brain Stem Saccadic Burst Generator Encodes Gaze in Three-Dimensional Space
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2602 - 2616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Busettini and L. E. Mays
Saccade-Vergence Interactions in Macaques. II. Vergence Enhancement as the Product of a Local Feedback Vergence Motor Error and a Weighted Saccadic Burst
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2312 - 2330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.