HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/4/2312    most recent 01337.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Busettini, C. Articles by Mays, L. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Busettini, C. Articles by Mays, L. E.

Saccade–Vergence Interactions in Macaques. II. Vergence Enhancement as the Product of a Local Feedback Vergence Motor Error and a Weighted Saccadic Burst

Department of Vision Sciences and Vision Science Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Submitted 27 December 2004; accepted in final form 18 May 2005

In the accompanying paper we reported that intrasaccadic vergence enhancement during combined saccade–vergence eye movements reflects saccadic dynamics, which implies the involvement of saccadic burst signals. This involvement was not predicted by the Multiply Model of Zee et al. We propose a model wherein vergence enhancement is the result of a multiplicative interaction between a weighted saccadic burst signal and a nonvisual short-latency estimate of the vergence motor error at the time of the saccade. The enhancement of vergence velocity by saccades causes the vergence goal to be approached more rapidly than if no saccade had occurred. The adjustment of the postsaccadic vergence velocity to this faster reduction in vergence motor error occurred with a time course too fast for visual feedback. This implies the presence of an internal estimate of the progress of the movement and indicates that vergence responses are under the control of a local feedback mechanism. It also implies that the vergence enhancement signal is included in the vergence feedback loop and is an integral part of the vergence velocity command. Our multiplicative model is able to predict the peak velocity of the vergence enhancement as a function of cyclopean saccadic dynamics, smooth vergence dynamics, and saccade–vergence timing with remarkable precision. It performed equally well for both horizontal and vertical saccades with very similar parameters, suggesting a common mechanism for all saccadic directions. A saccade–vergence additive model is also presented, although it would require external switching elements. Possible neural implementations are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. Van Horn, P. A. Sylvestre, and K. E. Cullen The Brain Stem Saccadic Burst Generator Encodes Gaze in Three-Dimensional Space J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2602 - 2616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vernet, Q. Yang, G. Daunys, C. Orssaud, T. Eggert, and Z. Kapoula How the Brain Obeys Hering's Law: A TMS Study of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 230 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wei, N. Li, S. D. Newlands, J. D. Dickman, and D. E. Angelaki Deficits and Recovery in Visuospatial Memory During Head Motion After Bilateral Labyrinthine Lesion J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1676 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Busettini and L. E. Mays Saccade-Vergence Interactions in Macaques. I. Test of the Omnipause Multiply Model J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2295 - 2311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]