HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ventura, V. Articles by Kass, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ventura, V. Articles by Kass, R. E.

INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY

Trial-to-Trial Variability and Its Effect on Time-Varying Dependency Between Two Neurons

Department of Statistics and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Submitted 25 June 2004; accepted in final form 23 March 2005

The joint peristimulus time histogram (JPSTH) and cross-correlogram provide a visual representation of correlated activity for a pair of neurons, and the way this activity may increase or decrease over time. In a companion paper we showed how a Bootstrap evaluation of the peaks in the smoothed diagonals of the JPSTH may be used to establish the likely validity of apparent time-varying correlation. As noted in earlier studies by Brody and Ben-Shaul et al., trial-to-trial variation can confound correlation and synchrony effects. In this paper we elaborate on that observation, and present a method of estimating the time-dependent trial-to-trial variation in spike trains that may exceed the natural variation displayed by Poisson and non-Poisson point processes. The statistical problem is somewhat subtle because relatively few spikes per trial are available for estimating a firing-rate function that fluctuates over time. The method developed here decomposes the spike-train variability into a stimulus-related component and a trial-specific component, allowing many degrees of freedom to characterize the former while assuming a small number suffices to characterize the latter. The Bootstrap significance test of the companion paper is then modified to accommodate these general excitability effects. This methodology allows an investigator to assess whether excitability effects are constant or time-varying, and whether they are shared by two neurons. In data from two V1 neurons we find that highly statistically significant evidence of dependency disappears after adjustment for time-varying trial-to-trial variation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Li, W. Zhou, X. Li, S. Zeng, and Q. Luo Dynamics of Learning in Cultured Neuronal Networks with Antagonists of Glutamate Receptors Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4151 - 4158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Kass and V. Ventura Spike Count Correlation Increases with Length of Time Interval in the Presence of Trial-to-Trial Variation. Neural Comput., November 1, 2006; 18(11): 2583 - 2591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Amarasingham, T.-L. Chen, S. Geman, M. T. Harrison, and D. L. Sheinberg Spike Count Reliability and the Poisson Hypothesis J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 801 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Ventura, C. Cai, and R. E. Kass Statistical Assessment of Time-Varying Dependency Between Two Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2940 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]