HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/5/3023    most recent 00002.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bensmaïa, S. J. Articles by Johnson, K. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bensmaïa, S. J. Articles by Johnson, K. O.

Vibratory Adaptation of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents

¹Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, and ²Departments of Neuroscience and ³Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 3 January 2005; accepted in final form 11 July 2005

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of extended suprathreshold vibratory stimulation on the sensitivity of slowly adapting type 1 (SA1), rapidly adapting (RA), and Pacinian (PC) afferents. To that end, an algorithm was developed to track afferent absolute (I₀) and entrainment (I₁) thresholds as they change over time. We recorded afferent responses to periliminal vibratory test stimuli, which were interleaved with intense vibratory conditioning stimuli during the adaptation period of each experimental run. From these measurements, the algorithm allowed us to infer changes in the afferents' sensitivity. We investigated the stimulus parameters that affect adaptation by assessing the degree to which adaptation depends on the amplitude and frequency of the adapting stimulus. For all three afferent types, I₀ and I₁ increased with increasing adaptation frequency and amplitude. The degree of adaptation seems to be independent of the firing rate evoked in the afferent by the conditioning stimulus. In the analysis, we distinguished between additive adaptation (in which I₀ and I₁ shift equally) and multiplicative effects (in which the ratio I₁/I₀ remains constant). RA threshold shifts are almost perfectly additive. SA1 threshold shifts are close to additive and far from multiplicative (I₁ threshold shifts are twice the I₀ shifts). PC shifts are more difficult to classify. We used an integrate-and-fire model to study the possible neural mechanisms. A change in transducer gain predicts a multiplicative change in I₀ and I₁ and is thus ruled out as a mechanism underlying SA1 and RA adaptation. A change in the resting action potential threshold predicts equal, additive change in I₀ and I₁ and thus accounts well for RA adaptation. A change in the degree of refractoriness during the relative refractory period predicts an additional change in I₁ such as that observed for SA1 fibers. We infer that adaptation is caused by an increase in spiking thresholds produced by ion flow through transducer channels in the receptor membrane. In a companion paper, we describe the time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery for SA1, RA, and PC fibers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Muniak, S. Ray, S. S. Hsiao, J. F. Dammann, and S. J. Bensmaia The Neural Coding of Stimulus Intensity: Linking the Population Response of Mechanoreceptive Afferents with Psychophysical Behavior J. Neurosci., October 24, 2007; 27(43): 11687 - 11699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Simons, J. Chiu, O. V. Favorov, B. L. Whitsel, and M. Tommerdahl Duration-Dependent Response of SI to Vibrotactile Stimulation in Squirrel Monkey J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2121 - 2129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Berryman, J. M. Yau, and S. S. Hsiao Representation of Object Size in the Somatosensory System J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 27 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Sripati, S. J. Bensmaia, and K. O. Johnson A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial Patterns J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3852 - 3864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hollins, F. Lorenz, and D. Harper Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. J. Neurosci., May 17, 2006; 26(20): 5582 - 5588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Goodwin Paradoxes in Tactile Adaptation. Focus on "Vibratory Adaptation in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents" and "Time-Course of Vibratory Adaptation and Recovery in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents" J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 2995 - 2996. [Full Text] [PDF]