HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leung, Y. Y. Articles by Johnson, K. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leung, Y. Y. Articles by Johnson, K. O.

Time-Course of Vibratory Adaptation and Recovery in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents

¹Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, ²Department of Neuroscience, and ³Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 3 January 2005; accepted in final form 11 July 2005

Extended suprathreshold vibratory stimulation applied to the skin results in a desensitization of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. In a companion paper, we describe the dependence of the threshold shift on the parameters of the adapting stimulus and discuss neural mechanisms underlying afferent adaptation. Here we describe the time-course of afferent adaptation and recovery. We found that absolute and entrainment thresholds rise and fall exponentially during adaptation and recovery with time constants that vary with fiber type. slowly adapting type I (SA1) afferents adapt most rapidly, and pacinian (PC) afferents adapt most slowly, whereas rapidly adapting (RA) afferents exhibit intermediate rates of adaptation; SA1 fibers also recover more rapidly from adaptation than RA and PC fibers. We also showed that threshold adaptation is accompanied by a shift in the timing of the spikes within individual cycles of the adapting stimulus (i.e., a shift in the impulse phase). We invoked an integrate-and-fire model to explore possible mechanisms underlying afferent adaptation. Finally, we found that the time-course of afferent adaptation is more rapid than that of its psychophysical counterpart, as is the time-course of recovery from adaptation, suggesting that central factors play a role in the psychophysical phenomenon.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Muniak, S. Ray, S. S. Hsiao, J. F. Dammann, and S. J. Bensmaia The Neural Coding of Stimulus Intensity: Linking the Population Response of Mechanoreceptive Afferents with Psychophysical Behavior J. Neurosci., October 24, 2007; 27(43): 11687 - 11699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Beauchamp, N. E. Yasar, N. Kishan, and T. Ro Human MST But Not MT Responds to Tactile Stimulation J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8261 - 8267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Berryman, J. M. Yau, and S. S. Hsiao Representation of Object Size in the Somatosensory System J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 27 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hollins, F. Lorenz, and D. Harper Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. J. Neurosci., May 17, 2006; 26(20): 5582 - 5588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Bensmaia, J. C. Craig, and K. O. Johnson Temporal Factors in Tactile Spatial Acuity: Evidence for RA Interference in Fine Spatial Processing J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1783 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Goodwin Paradoxes in Tactile Adaptation. Focus on "Vibratory Adaptation in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents" and "Time-Course of Vibratory Adaptation and Recovery in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents" J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 2995 - 2996. [Full Text] [PDF]