HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/5/3058    most recent 00671.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shemmell, J. Articles by Carson, R. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shemmell, J. Articles by Carson, R. G.

Neuromuscular Adaptation During Skill Acquisition on a Two Degree-of-Freedom Target-Acquisition Task: Dynamic Movement

Perception and Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Submitted 2 July 2004; accepted in final form 11 June 2005

In this experiment, we examined the extent to which the spatiotemporal reorganization of muscle synergies mediates skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom (df) target-acquisition task. Eight participants completed five practice sessions on consecutive days. During each session they practiced movements to eight target positions presented by a visual display. The movements required combinations of flexion/extension and pronation/supination of the elbow joint complex. During practice sessions, eight targets displaced 5.4 cm from the start position (representing joint excursions of 54°) were presented 16 times. During pre- and posttests, participants acquired the targets at two distances (3.6 cm [36°] and 7.2 cm [72°]). EMG data were recorded from eight muscles contributing to the movements during the pre- and posttests. Most targets were acquired more rapidly after the practice period. Performance improvements were, in most target directions, accompanied by increases in the smoothness of the movement trajectories. When target acquisition required movement in both dfs, there were also practice-related decreases in the extent to which the trajectories deviated from a direct path to the target. The contribution of monofunctional muscles (those producing torque in a single df) increased with practice during movements in which they acted as agonists. The activity in bifunctional muscles (those contributing torque in both dfs) remained at pretest levels in most movements. The results suggest that performance gains were mediated primarily by changes in the spatial organization of muscles synergies. These changes were expressed most prominently in terms of the magnitude of activation of the monofunctional muscles.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Duchateau, J. G. Semmler, and R. M. Enoka Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1766 - 1775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Carson Changes in muscle coordination with training J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1506 - 1513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]