HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/5/3192    most recent 00424.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chakrabarty, S. Articles by Martin, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chakrabarty, S. Articles by Martin, J. H.

Motor But Not Sensory Representation in Motor Cortex Depends on Postsynaptic Activity During Development and in Maturity

¹Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University; and ²New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York

Submitted 27 April 2005; accepted in final form 15 July 2005

The movement representation in the primary motor cortex (M1) of the cat develops between postnatal weeks 7–12. The somatosensory representation in motor cortex is present by the age that the motor map begins to develop. In this study we examined the role of neural activity in development and maintenance of the M1 movement and somatosensory representations. We blocked activity of M1 neurons unilaterally for one month by intracortical infusion of the GABA agonist muscimol during the motor map development period in kittens and in mature cats. After the drug effects were no longer present, we used microstimulation and multiunit recording in the forelimb areas of M1 to determine the motor and somatosensory representations in the infused and noninfused sides. In both kittens and adults, there was a severe reduction or elimination of sites where microstimulation evoked a motor response in the inactivated compared with the control side. In contrast, there was no difference in the percentage, topography or receptive field modality of sites receiving somatosensory inputs on the inactivated and control sides. Moreover, the pattern of somatosensory input to M1 was similar before and after inactivation. This suggests that somatosensory input to M1 is stable after the connections initially develop. Since activity blockade had the same effects on the motor representation of kittens and adult cats, M1 neuronal activity, while possibly important in map development, is equally necessary for map maintenance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Ghosh, E. Sydekum, F. Haiss, S. Peduzzi, B. Zorner, R. Schneider, C. Baltes, M. Rudin, B. Weber, and M. E. Schwab Functional and Anatomical Reorganization of the Sensory-Motor Cortex after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Rats J. Neurosci., September 30, 2009; 29(39): 12210 - 12219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chakrabarty, K. M. Friel, and J. H. Martin Activity-Dependent Plasticity Improves M1 Motor Representation and Corticospinal Tract Connectivity J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1283 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Giszter, M. R. Davies, A. Ramakrishnan, U. I. Udoekwere, and W. J. Kargo Trunk Sensorimotor Cortex Is Essential for Autonomous Weight-Supported Locomotion in Adult Rats Spinalized as P1/P2 Neonates J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 839 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]