HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/6/3987    most recent 00569.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shoykhet, M. Articles by Simons, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shoykhet, M. Articles by Simons, D. J.

Whisker Trimming Begun at Birth or on Postnatal Day 12 Affects Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Layer IV Barrel Neurons

Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Submitted 31 May 2005; accepted in final form 8 August 2005

In rats, whisker trimming during development leads to persistent alterations in the function of cortical barrel circuits and to behavioral deficits later in life. Here we examined how whisker trimming begun either at birth (P0) or on postnatal day 12 (P12), around the onset of whisking behavior, affects receptive fields of layer IV barrel neurons. All whiskers on the left face were trimmed for 40–45 days and then allowed to regrow fully. Extracellular single-unit recordings and controlled deflections of principal and adjacent whiskers (PW and AW, respectively), individually or in paired combinations, were used to assess excitatory and suppressive effects of neighboring whiskers on barrel neurons. Results indicate that whisker trimming both from P0 and P12 leads to enlarged excitatory and weakened inhibitory receptive fields in layer IV neurons. PW- and AW-evoked responses are larger in magnitude in trimmed than in control animals; AW-evoked responses are disproportionately affected, decreasing the spatial focus of barrel neurons. Deprivation after P12 accounts for 50% of the total effect observed in P0 trimmed animals. Suppressive interactions, evoked by two whiskers deflected in succession, are weaker in trimmed than in control animals. Suppressive caudal/rostral and ventral/dorsal gradients, however, seem unaffected by sensory deprivation. Thus the developmental period during which experience persistently modifies maturing barrel circuitry extends up to and likely beyond the onset of whisking behavior. Sensory deprivation during this time affects development of both excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields of barrel neurons and likely impairs cortical integration of sensory information from multiple whiskers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Shoykhet and D. J. Simons Development of Thalamocortical Response Transformations in the Rat Whisker-Barrel System J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 356 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Lee, P. W. Land, and D. J. Simons Layer- and Cell-Type-Specific Effects of Neonatal Whisker-Trimming in Adult Rat Barrel Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4380 - 4385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. McRae, M. M. Rocco, G. Kelly, J. C. Brumberg, and R. T. Matthews Sensory Deprivation Alters Aggrecan and Perineuronal Net Expression in the Mouse Barrel Cortex J. Neurosci., May 16, 2007; 27(20): 5405 - 5413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Jiao, C. Zhang, Y. Yanagawa, and Q.-Q. Sun Major Effects of Sensory Experiences on the Neocortical Inhibitory Circuits. J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8691 - 8701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]