JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 4068-4081, 2005. First published August 24, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.00130.2005
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/4068    most recent
00130.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allred, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jagadeesh, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allred, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jagadeesh, B.

Selectivity of Inferior Temporal Neurons for Realistic Pictures Predicted by Algorithms for Image Database Navigation

Sarah Allred, Yan Liu and Bharathi Jagadeesh

Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Submitted 3 February 2005; accepted in final form 14 August 2005

Primates have a remarkable ability to perceive, recognize, and discriminate among the plethora of people, places, and things that they see, and neural selectivity in the primate inferotemporal (IT) cortex is thought to underlie this ability. Here we investigated the relationship between neural response and perception by recording from IT neurons in monkeys while they viewed realistic images. We then compared the similarity of neural responses elicited by images to the quantitative similarity of the images. Image similarity was approximated using several algorithms, two of which were designed to search image databases for perceptually similar images. Some algorithms for image similarity correlated well with human perception, and these algorithms explained part of the stimulus selectivity of IT neurons. Images that elicited similar neural responses were ranked as more similar by these algorithms than images that elicited different neural responses, and images ranked as similar by the algorithms elicited similar responses from neurons. Neural selectivity was predicted more accurately when the reference images for algorithm similarity elicited either very strong or very weak responses from the neuron. The degree to which algorithms for image similarity were correlated with human perception was related to the degree to which algorithms explained the selectivity of IT neurons, providing support for the proposal that the selectivity of IT neurons is related to perceptual similarity of images.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. Jagadeesh, Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Box 357330, Seattle, WA 98195 (E-mail: bjag{at}u.washington.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. R. Allred and B. Jagadeesh
Quantitative Comparison Between Neural Response in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex and Behavioral Discrimination of Photographic Images
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1263 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.